Facts
UPSC advertised vacancies for Assistant Public Prosecutor in the Directorate of Prosecution, Government of NCT of Delhi, including EWS vacancies.
Source reference: no citationThe applicant applied in the Unreserved category.
Source reference: no citationShe stated that she later obtained an EWS certificate before the application deadline of 2 October 2026, but could not edit or refile her application to claim EWS status.
Source reference: p. 2–4She had submitted a representation to UPSC dated 30 September 2026 and sought, among other reliefs, consideration of her candidature in the EWS category.
Source reference: p. 2–4The Tribunal disposed of the original application by directing UPSC to consider and decide that representation.
Source reference: p. 5Issues
1. Whether UPSC should be directed to consider and decide the applicant’s representation seeking a change of category from Unreserved to EWS
Source reference: p. 52. Whether the Tribunal should itself direct that the applicant be permitted to submit an online or offline application for the category change
Source reference: p. 5Law Applied
The application was brought under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, which provides for an application to the Tribunal concerning a service matter.
Source reference: p. 4The order cites no statutory provision, recruitment rule, precedent, or substantive legal test governing a change of category in the selection process.
Source reference: p. 5It directs UPSC to decide the applicant’s representation in accordance with law, by a reasoned and speaking order.
Source reference: p. 5Reasoning
The Tribunal did not determine whether the applicant was entitled to EWS consideration or whether UPSC’s application system unlawfully prevented a category change.
Source reference: p. 5Instead, given the representation dated 30 September 2026 and the grievance raised, it directed UPSC to consider the matter holistically and decide the representation in accordance with law.
Source reference: p. 5It left open the possibility of permitting an online or offline category-change application if UPSC deemed that appropriate, noting that no separate window had been prescribed for that purpose.
Source reference: p. 5Holding
The Tribunal disposed of the original application and directed UPSC to consider and decide the applicant’s representation dated 30 September 2026 within one month of receiving a certified copy of the order, through a reasoned and speaking order.
UPSC was directed to consider the grievance holistically and, if deemed appropriate, permit an online or offline application for change of category.
Source reference: p. 5The Tribunal did not itself grant EWS status or direct that the applicant be considered in that category.
Source reference: p. 5Pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of; there was no order as to costs.
Source reference: p. 5Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Administrative Tribunals Act, 19851
Original Court PDF
Parul BansalvsUNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (UPSC)
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![Category-change representations require reasoned consideration, but reclassification is not guaranteed.. Parul Bansal vs UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (UPSC). CAT - ['Delhi']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/category-change-representations-require-reasoned-consideration-but-reclassification-is-not-d2420c6f06f3410585a6166ed0ad7feb.webp)