Facts
The applicant, widow of a former Central Excise Inspector, stated that her husband was promoted to Inspector on 25 May 2000 and died on 31 July 2000.
Source reference: p. 4She sought revision of his pay from the scale of Rs. 5,500–9,000 to Rs. 6,500–10,500 with effect from 1 January 1996, together with consequential benefits; her representation was pending.
Source reference: p. 4She relied on Tribunal and court decisions concerning the revised pay scales for Inspectors and Superintendents, including decisions affirmed by the Supreme Court, and on earlier Chennai Bench orders said to have been implemented.
Source reference: pp. 4–5The respondents appeared through counsel, and the Tribunal disposed of the OA at the admission stage.
Source reference: pp. 6–7Issues
1. Whether the applicant was entitled to notional pay fixation from 1 January 1996 and consequential monetary benefits from that date, or whether actual financial benefits were payable only from 21 April 2004 under the Anomaly Committee recommendations and the Office Memorandum issued pursuant to them.
Source reference: p. 62. Whether the earlier Tribunal and court decisions relied upon by the applicant governed her claim.
Source reference: pp. 6–7Law Applied
The Tribunal applied the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997, as the framework for refixation of pay.
Source reference: p. 7It relied on prior decisions concerning the revised scales for Central Excise Inspectors and Superintendents, including the Hyderabad Bench’s order in OA No. 1089/2019 and the Jaipur Bench’s order in OA No. 154/2015, which had been upheld by the respective High Courts and affirmed by the Supreme Court.
Source reference: pp. 5–6As described by the Tribunal, those decisions supported notional revision from 1 January 1996, with actual monetary benefits from 21 April 2004, to address unequal treatment of similarly situated employees.
Source reference: pp. 5–6Reasoning
The Tribunal considered the issue covered by the Hyderabad and Jaipur decisions, noting that the former had been affirmed by the Telangana High Court and Supreme Court and that similar Chennai Bench applications had also been allowed and implemented.
Source reference: p. 6Applying those decisions and the 1997 Revised Pay Rules, it directed refixation from 1 January 1996 on a notional basis, while limiting actual monetary benefits to the period beginning 21 April 2004. It also included pensionary benefits in the relief.
Source reference: p. 7Holding
The Tribunal disposed of the OA and directed the respondents to consider the applicant’s representation dated 20 August 2026, refix her husband’s pay under the CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997, and grant the consequential benefits: notional fixation from 1 January 1996 and actual monetary benefits from 21 April 2004, including pensionary benefits.
The exercise was to be completed within two months of receipt of the order.
Source reference: p. 7Original Court PDF
S UshavsFINANCE
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![Central Excise officers are entitled to revised pay fixation notionally from 1 January 1996 and monetary benefits from 21 April 2004.. S Usha vs FINANCE. CAT - ['Chennai']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/central-excise-officers-are-entitled-to-revised-pay-fixation-notionally-from-1-january-199-dab75aa0320d485b98454c10568ac6f8.webp)