01Facts
The petitioners are retired or serving employees of Steel Authority of India (SAIL) and members of the SAIL Employees Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. (Respondent Society), a multi-state cooperative society
p. 8Since 2024, the Society failed to return substantial fixed deposits to members facing financial and medical hardships
p. 9Several petitioners obtained favorable orders from the Co-operative Ombudsman under Section 85A of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies (MSCS) Act, 2002, directing repayment within 15 days
pp. 9-10Despite these binding orders, the Society—citing poor financial health, frozen accounts by the West Bengal Economic Offence Wing, and alleged defalcations by previous management—failed to comply
p. 11, 23, 29A forensic audit revealed a net deficit of approximately Rs. 365 crores against total deposit exposures of Rs. 430 crores
p. 19, 2602Issues
i.1. Whether the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 provides an adequate mechanism for the enforcement of orders passed by the Co-operative Ombudsman
pp. 13-14ii.2. Whether the financial mismanagement and erosion of net worth justify the winding up of the Society under Section 86 of the MSCS Act
p. 18, 36iii.3. Whether the Court can exercise its writ jurisdiction to bypass statutory lacunae and secure the interests of depositors/senior citizens
p. 37, 4103Law Applied
Section 85A of the MSCS Act, 2002 (as amended in 2023), which establishes the Co-operative Ombudsman for redressal of member complaints regarding deposits and mandates society compliance within one month
p. 33Section 86 regarding the winding up of societies and Section 89 for the appointment of a Liquidator
p. 33, 37Rule 29 of the MSCS Rules, 2002 was applied to establish the order of priority for liabilities, placing pro-rata repayment of deposits of members second only to outside liabilities
p. 39Precedent in Writers & Publishers (P) Ltd. v. Super Bazar Official Liquidator (2021), which clarified the distribution of assets during the winding up of a multi-state cooperative society
pp. 37-40Provisions in the judgment · 17 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 12 provisions
Section 64Section 70Section 77Section 78Section 79Section 85Section 86Section 89Section 90Section 97Section 104Section 108Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 61Section 316Section 318
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 175
West Bengal Protection Of Interest Of Depositors In Financial Establishments Act, 2013 Section 3
04Reasoning
The Court observed a significant statutory lacuna: while Section 85A(2) makes the Ombudsman’s orders binding, the Act lacks a penal or enforcement mechanism for non-compliance, rendering such orders mere "paper orders"
p. 33, 35The Court found that the Society’s financial health was severely compromised due to administrative mismanagement and illegal investment of over Rs. 100 crores into a separate trust (Ispat Cooperative Foundation) without Central Registrar approval
pp. 21-22Applying the forensic audit findings, which showed eroded net worth and fraudulent transactions, the Court determined that the Society had ceased to function on cooperative principles
p. 17, 36Leveraging its extraordinary writ jurisdiction, the Court concluded that since a show-cause notice for winding up had already been issued by the Central Registrar on November 28, 2025, without a response from the Society, immediate transition to liquidation was necessary to protect the senior citizen depositors from further hardship
pp. 36-37, 4105Holding
The Court disposed of the petitions by directing the Central Registrar to pass a formal winding-up order under Section 86 and appoint a Liquidator under Section 89 by June 15, 2026
p. 41The Liquidator is directed to seize all assets—including hospitals, holiday homes, and frozen bank accounts—disclosed in the Society’s affidavit
p. 41The Court ordered that all Society funds be consolidated into a nationalized bank account by July 15, 2026
p. 42Specifically, the Court held that the claims of the petitioners and others with Ombudsman orders must be honored in a time-bound manner, with an endeavor to pay them by October 15, 2026, according to the priority established in Rule 29
p. 42Criminal proceedings against the former management remain unaffected
p. 42Original Court PDF
Mahendra Kumar KathpalvsUnion Of India & Ors.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
