Facts
The petitioner challenged a RERA order dated 18 June 2026, which he said wrongly required him to pay maintenance charges and GST before the occupancy/completion certificate was issued. He also sought directions concerning possession and transfer of common areas, penal proceedings, and compensation
Source reference: para. 1Although the petitioner initially approached the High Court on the basis that the RERA Appellate Authority was not functioning properly, respondents submitted that it was hearing appeals and interim applications
Source reference: paras. 2–5The petitioner then sought permission to withdraw the petition and appeal to the Appellate Authority
Source reference: para. 6Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should pursue an appeal before the RERA Appellate Authority, which respondents submitted was functioning and hearing matters.
Source reference: paras. 2–52. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal and an interim application before that Authority.
Source reference: para. 6Law Applied
The Court did not determine the substantive rights or obligations arising under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Although the petitioner’s requested reliefs invoked Sections 11(4)(b), 19(10), 17(1)–(2), 63, 71 and 18(3) of the Act, the Court did not interpret or apply those provisions on their merits
Source reference: para. 1It permitted the petitioner to pursue the appeal remedy and directed the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal, particularly the interim application, in accordance with law
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
Respondents stated that the RERA Appellate Authority was functioning and entertaining appeals and stay applications
Source reference: paras. 3–5In light of those submissions, the petitioner chose to withdraw the writ petition and seek recourse before that Authority
Source reference: para. 6The Court accepted that course without deciding the merits of the challenge to the RERA order or the petitioner’s statutory claims, and left their consideration to the Appellate Authority
Source reference: paras. 7–8Holding
The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to file a duly constituted appeal before the RERA Appellate Authority along with an appropriate interim application.
It directed the Authority to consider the appeal, particularly the interim application, in accordance with law and endeavour to decide it expeditiously.
Source reference: para. 7Acts & Sections Cited
6 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.6
Original Court PDF
GOPAL BHAI PATELvsM/S Aadharshila Developers Pvt Ltd.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
