01Facts
The Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 (husband and wife) had a domestic dispute on October 20, 2025, during which the Petitioner, in an inebriated state, allegedly assaulted the Respondent.
¶ 3.1Respondent No. 2 attempted suicide by jumping from the second floor of their house, resulting in orthopedic injuries but not death.
¶ 3.1/6The Banaswadi Police registered an FIR and subsequently filed a charge sheet for offences under Sections 108 (Abetment of suicide), 62, 85, and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.
¶ 6The Petitioner remained in custody for six months.
¶ 8During the proceedings, the parties reconciled and filed a joint memo to quench the criminal proceedings based on a settlement.
¶ 902Issues
i.1. Whether a charge under Section 108 of the BNS (Abetment of suicide) can be sustained when the victim is alive.
¶ 7ii.2. Whether the Court should exercise its power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (Section 528 BNSS) to quash proceedings based on a matrimonial settlement despite the gravity of the initial charges.
¶ 1203Law Applied
The Court primarily applied Section 108 of the BNS, 2023, which mandates that culpability for abetment of suicide arises only "if any person commits suicide".
¶ 7The provision is not elastic and requires the prerequisite of an actual death.
¶ 7The Court also exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. (now Section 528 of the BNSS) to quash proceedings in matrimonial disputes where parties have settled to ensure justice and harmony.
¶ 12Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 482
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528
04Reasoning
The Court observed that the prosecution’s invocation of Section 108 BNS was "reckless" and a "glaring manifestation of non-application of mind" because the victim (the wife) was alive and present in court.
¶ 8/10Since Section 108 specifically punishes abetment of a suicide that has occurred, registering a case and filing a charge sheet for this offence in the absence of a death was found to be legally non-existent and an abuse of authority.
¶ 7/10The Court critiqued the Investigating Officer for the "mechanical prosecution" that led to the Petitioner’s six-month incarceration.
¶ 8Furthermore, applying the principles of restorative justice in matrimonial matters, the Court noted that since the parties had buried their differences and sought a reunion, continuing the criminal trial would be a futile exercise and a "needless agony".
¶ 1205Holding
The Court held that Section 108 BNS cannot be invoked if the victim survives the suicide attempt.
¶ 9The Court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings in C.C.No.52473/2026. The Petitioner was ordered to be released from prison forthwith.
Order I/II/IIIThe Court directed the Competent Authority to initiate a meaningful departmental enquiry against the Investigating Officer for professional irresponsibility and ignorance of the elementary ingredients of the law, with a report due within three months.
¶ 11/Order VOriginal Court PDF
MR. NIXONvsSTATE BY
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
