Facts
The applicants were arrested in Crime No. 436/2026, registered at Police Station Arang, for an alleged offence under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915.
Source reference: para. 2The prosecution alleged that 28.800 bulk litres of country-made liquor were recovered from their joint possession while being transported in a car.
Source reference: para. 2The applicants sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, submitting that the liquor was not recovered from any applicant’s exclusive possession, the charge-sheet had been filed, and they had no prior criminal antecedents.
Source reference: paras. 1, 3The State opposed bail, noting one prior IPC antecedent for Applicant No. 1 and relying on the quantity seized.
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the applicants should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in light of the alleged recovery and relevant circumstances.
Source reference: paras. 5–6Whether the applicants’ custody, the filing of the charge-sheet, their antecedents, and the likely duration of trial supported release on bail.
Source reference: para. 6Law Applied
Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, provides the basis for the application for regular bail.
Source reference: para. 1The alleged offence was punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915.
Source reference: paras. 1–2In deciding the application, the Court considered the alleged quantity seized, the applicants’ criminal antecedents, the filing of the charge-sheet, the period spent in custody, and the likely time required to conclude the trial.
Source reference: para. 6No precedent was cited.
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The Court weighed the alleged joint recovery of 28.800 bulk litres against the fact that the charge-sheet had been filed, the applicants had been in custody since 14 September 2026, and the trial was likely to take time.
Source reference: para. 6It also considered that Applicant No. 1 had one prior IPC antecedent from 2023, while the other applicants had none.
Source reference: para. 6On those circumstances, the Court found it appropriate to grant bail without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The Court allowed the bail application and directed that each applicant be released upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
Bail was subject to conditions prohibiting interference with witnesses or the fair and expeditious trial, and requiring appearance on every date fixed by the trial Court until disposal of the case.
Source reference: para. 7Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231
Original Court PDF
UBARAN DAS PURENAvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
