Facts
The petitioners filed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 7 March 2026 in E.P. No. 141 of 2026 in R.L.T.O.P. No. 386 of 2025, before the Xth Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
Source reference: p.2During the revision, the parties stated that they had amicably resolved their disputes and entered into a joint memo of compromise dated 1 October 2026, signed by the parties and their counsel.
Source reference: p.2Issues
Whether the revision petition should be disposed of in accordance with the parties’ joint memo of compromise.
Source reference: p.2; p.7Whether any further relief or costs should be ordered following the settlement.
Source reference: p.7Law Applied
The petition invoked the High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution.
Source reference: p.2The Court disposed of the revision in accordance with the parties’ joint memo of compromise, which it directed to form part of its order.
Source reference: p.7Reasoning
The Court recorded that the parties had amicably resolved all disputes and mutual claims, with no further claims against each other, and had executed a joint memo of compromise.
Source reference: p.2As the parties had settled the matter, the Court did not adjudicate the merits of the challenge to the execution court’s order; it disposed of the revision on the terms of the compromise.
Source reference: p.7Holding
The revision petition was disposed of in terms of the joint memo of compromise dated 1 October 2026, which was made part of the order.
No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
Source reference: p.7Original Court PDF
P.SivakumarvsH.Rahamathulla
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
