Chhattisgarh High Court

Compensation for death of a minor child enhanced to five lakh rupees per Kishan Gopal precedent.

DHANUSH DHIVAR vs GANGARAM

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 10, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellants are the parents of Ku. Urvashi, a three-year-old child who died in a road accident on 09.01.2015

Source reference: para 2, 11

Following the accident, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs. 2,50,000 via an award dated 25.07.2016

Source reference: para 11

The appellants, who are illiterate residents of a remote village in the Janjgir-Champa district, failed to file a timely appeal, resulting in a delay of 1206 days

Source reference: para 2, 5

They subsequently filed an appeal under Section 173(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of the compensation

Source reference: para 11
02

Issues

1. Whether the delay of 1206 days in filing the appeal should be condoned based on the appellants' socio-economic circumstances

Source reference: para 5

2. Whether the compensation of Rs. 2,50,000 awarded for the death of a three-year-old child is just and proper in light of established precedents

Source reference: para 12, 15
03

Law Applied

Section 173(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, which governs the filing of appeals against Tribunal awards

Source reference: para 11

legal precedent established by the Supreme Court in Kishan Gopal v. Lala (2014) 1 SCC 244, which provides a benchmark for awarding compensation in cases involving the death of a minor child

Source reference: para 12, 15

sufficient cause while applying the principle of equity by withholding interest for the period of delay

Source reference: para 5
04

Reasoning

The Court first addressed the delay of 1206 days. It held that the appellants' illiteracy and residence in a remote area constituted sufficient reason for the delay, as they were unaware of the legal remedies for seeking enhancement

Source reference: para 5

To ensure the respondent-Insurance Company was not unfairly prejudiced, the Court condoned the delay but stipulated that no interest would be payable on any enhanced amount for the 1206-day period

Source reference: para 5

On the merits of the compensation, the Court examined the age of the deceased (three years) and the date of the accident (2015)

Source reference: para 15

Applying the ratio of Kishan Gopal, the Court found that the Tribunal's award of Rs. 2,50,000 was inadequate and that a sum of Rs. 5,00,000 was appropriate for the death of a minor child under these circumstances

Source reference: para 15
05

Holding

The Court allowed the appeal in part and modified the impugned award

The delay of 1206 days was condoned

Source reference: para 5

The compensation was enhanced by an additional Rs. 2,50,000, bringing the total award to Rs. 5,00,000

Source reference: para 15

The respondent was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within 45 days, carrying interest at 8% per annum from the date of the claim application, excluding the period of delay

Source reference: para 15

All other conditions of the original award remained intact

Source reference: para 15
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

DHANUSH DHIVARvsGANGARAM

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 10, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment