Chhattisgarh High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Compensation for death of a minor child enhanced to five lakh rupees per Kishan Gopal precedent.

DHANUSH DHIVAR vs GANGARAM

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 10, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Compensation for death of a minor child enhanced to five lakh rupees per Kishan Gopal precedent.. DHANUSH DHIVAR vs GANGARAM. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellants are the parents of Ku. Urvashi, a three-year-old child who died in a road accident on 09.01.2015

Source reference: para 2, 11

Following the accident, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs. 2,50,000 via an award dated 25.07.2016

Source reference: para 11

The appellants, who are illiterate residents of a remote village in the Janjgir-Champa district, failed to file a timely appeal, resulting in a delay of 1206 days

Source reference: para 2, 5

They subsequently filed an appeal under Section 173(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of the compensation

Source reference: para 11
02

Issues

1. Whether the delay of 1206 days in filing the appeal should be condoned based on the appellants' socio-economic circumstances

Source reference: para 5

2. Whether the compensation of Rs. 2,50,000 awarded for the death of a three-year-old child is just and proper in light of established precedents

Source reference: para 12, 15
03

Law Applied

Section 173(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, which governs the filing of appeals against Tribunal awards

Source reference: para 11

legal precedent established by the Supreme Court in Kishan Gopal v. Lala (2014) 1 SCC 244, which provides a benchmark for awarding compensation in cases involving the death of a minor child

Source reference: para 12, 15

sufficient cause while applying the principle of equity by withholding interest for the period of delay

Source reference: para 5
04

Reasoning

The Court first addressed the delay of 1206 days. It held that the appellants' illiteracy and residence in a remote area constituted sufficient reason for the delay, as they were unaware of the legal remedies for seeking enhancement

Source reference: para 5

To ensure the respondent-Insurance Company was not unfairly prejudiced, the Court condoned the delay but stipulated that no interest would be payable on any enhanced amount for the 1206-day period

Source reference: para 5

On the merits of the compensation, the Court examined the age of the deceased (three years) and the date of the accident (2015)

Source reference: para 15

Applying the ratio of Kishan Gopal, the Court found that the Tribunal's award of Rs. 2,50,000 was inadequate and that a sum of Rs. 5,00,000 was appropriate for the death of a minor child under these circumstances

Source reference: para 15
05

Holding

The Court allowed the appeal in part and modified the impugned award

The delay of 1206 days was condoned

Source reference: para 5

The compensation was enhanced by an additional Rs. 2,50,000, bringing the total award to Rs. 5,00,000

Source reference: para 15

The respondent was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within 45 days, carrying interest at 8% per annum from the date of the claim application, excluding the period of delay

Source reference: para 15

All other conditions of the original award remained intact

Source reference: para 15
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

DHANUSH DHIVARvsGANGARAM

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 10, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment