Madras High Court
Insurance LawCivil Law

Compensation under owner-driver personal accident cover cannot exceed the policy’s insured limit.

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co., Ltd., vs SUMITHRA

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: October 07, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Compensation under owner-driver personal accident cover cannot exceed the policy’s insured limit.. Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co., Ltd., vs SUMITHRA. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimants— the deceased’s wife, two minor daughters and mother—sought compensation following his death in a motorcycle accident on 1 September 2019.

Source reference: pp.2–5

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partly allowed the claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, awarding Rs.26,47,200.

Source reference: pp.2–5

The insurer appealed, contending that the policy’s personal accident cover for the owner/driver was limited to Rs.15,00,000.

Source reference: pp.2–5

The claimants accepted modification to that amount, with interest at 7.5% per annum.

Source reference: pp.2–5
02

Issues

1. Whether the Tribunal’s award of Rs.26,47,200 could stand where the policy’s personal accident cover for the owner/driver was capped at Rs.15,00,000.

Source reference: pp.3–5

2. Whether the award should be modified to Rs.15,00,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum, as submitted by the claimants.

Source reference: p.4
03

Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal; the claim in this case had been brought under Section 166.

Source reference: pp.1, 3–5

The Court’s decision turned on the terms of the insurance policy, including the stated maximum personal accident cover of Rs.15,00,000 for the owner/driver.

Source reference: pp.3–5

The judgment cited no precedent and set out no further statutory test governing the policy limit.

Source reference: pp.1, 3–5
04

Reasoning

The insurer challenged the award only on quantum, relying on the certificate of insurance, which it described as limiting personal accident cover for the owner/driver to Rs.15,00,000.

Source reference: pp.4–5

After the Court drew attention to the policy terms and the premium paid for that cover, the claimants agreed to modification to Rs.15,00,000 with 7.5% annual interest.

Source reference: pp.4–5

In light of those submissions, the Court reduced the award to the policy-limit amount.

Source reference: pp.4–5
05

Holding

The appeal was partly allowed, and the Tribunal’s award was reduced from Rs.26,47,200 to Rs.15,00,000.

The insurer was directed to deposit that amount with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of the claim petition, together with the costs awarded by the Tribunal, after crediting any amount already deposited, within four weeks.

Source reference: pp.5–7

The judgment also prescribed transfer and fixed-deposit arrangements for the claimants’ shares, including those of the minor claimants.

Source reference: pp.5–7

No costs were ordered in the appeal, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

Source reference: pp.5–7
06

Acts & Sections Cited

3 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19883

Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co., Ltd.,vsSUMITHRA

Madras High Court · October 07, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment