Facts
The applicants, numbering 68 individuals, are employed as Casual Labourers with "1/30th status" (Group D posts) across various locations in Madhya Pradesh under the Archaeological Survey of India
Source reference: p.1-7Seeking regularisation or redressal of service grievances, the applicants submitted formal representations to the respondent department dated 02.05.2026 and 04.05.2026 [Annexure A/5].
Source reference: p.7-8Claiming that these representations remained pending without consideration, the applicants approached the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Jabalpur Bench, seeking a direction for a time-bound disposal of their claims
Source reference: p.7-8Issues
1. Whether the Tribunal should exercise its jurisdiction to direct the respondent authority to decide the pending representations of the applicants within a specific timeframe
Source reference: p.8 / para. 2-4Law Applied
The Tribunal applied the principles of administrative justice and the exhaustion of alternative remedies. Under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, and established service law jurisprudence, the competent authority is duty-bound to consider and decide the representations of employees in accordance with law
Source reference: p.8 / para. 4The court relied on the procedural consensus between parties to resolve the matter through a "direction to consider," rather than adjudicating on the merits of the case at this preliminary stage
Source reference: p.8 / para. 3-4Reasoning
The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the applicants' claims regarding their status as casual laborers. Instead, it focused on the procedural delay.
Source reference: p.7-8 / para. 2Counsel for the applicants limited the prayer to a direction for the respondents to decide the pending representations. The respondents, through their counsel, expressed no objection to deciding the matter in a time-bound manner.
Source reference: p.8 / para. 3Consequently, the Tribunal found it appropriate to dispose of the Original Application (OA) at the admission stage itself, bridging the gap between the applicants' grievances and the administrative decision-making process by imposing a 60-day deadline on the respondents
Source reference: p.8 / para. 4Holding
The Tribunal disposed of the O.A. without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. It directed the competent authority of the respondents to consider and decide the applicants’ representations dated 02.05.2026 and 04.05.2026 (Annexure A/5) in accordance with the law within 60 days from the receipt of the order
The applicants were further directed to provide a copy of the O.A. and the certified order to the department within 15 days
Source reference: p.8 / para. 5Original Court PDF
Satish TiwarivsARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in