Chhattisgarh High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Consortium is payable to the deceased’s husband and children, but not her mother-in-law.

VINOD KAUSHIK vs ALI AHMED KHAN

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 01, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Consortium is payable to the deceased’s husband and children, but not her mother-in-law.. VINOD KAUSHIK vs ALI AHMED KHAN. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimants appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation for the death of Sukwara Bai in a road accident on 14 February 2021.

Source reference: para. 1

The Claims Tribunal had awarded ₹12,11,000, assessing her monthly income at ₹6,000 and awarding consortium to her husband alone.

Source reference: para. 1–3

The claimants argued that income should have been assessed at the applicable minimum wage of ₹8,960 per month and that consortium was payable to four claimants.

Source reference: para. 2

The insurer disputed the entitlement of the deceased’s mother-in-law to consortium

Source reference: para. 1–3
02

Issues

Whether the deceased’s monthly income should be reassessed at ₹8,960 in accordance with the applicable Chhattisgarh minimum-wage notification

Source reference: para. 2, 5

Whether the conventional-head award should be enhanced by granting consortium to four claimants, excluding the deceased’s mother-in-law

Source reference: para. 2–5
03

Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: para. 1

In calculating compensation, National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680, supplies the principles for future prospects and conventional heads; Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation, (2009) 6 SCC 121, guides the assessment of deductions and multiplier; and Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram, (2018) 18 SCC 1305, informs entitlement to consortium.

Source reference: para. 6

The Court applied the applicable Chhattisgarh minimum-wage notification to assess the deceased’s income.

Source reference: para. 5
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the Tribunal’s assessment of ₹6,000 per month was below the applicable minimum wage and substituted ₹8,960.

Source reference: para. 5

It retained the Tribunal’s 40% addition for future prospects, one-fourth deduction for personal expenses, and multiplier of 15.

Source reference: para. 5–6

On consortium, it held that the husband and three children—four claimants in total—were entitled to ₹44,000 each, while the deceased’s mother-in-law was not entitled.

Source reference: para. 5–6

Adding ₹33,000 for funeral expenses and related rites, the Court fixed compensation under conventional heads at ₹2,09,000.

Source reference: para. 5–6
05

Holding

The Court partly allowed the appeal and enhanced total compensation from ₹12,11,000 to ₹19,02,440.

The claimants were awarded an additional ₹6,91,440, carrying interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim application until realization; the remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left unchanged.

Source reference: para. 7–9

The Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimants in Hindi, with paralegal assistance if required.

Source reference: para. 7–9
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

VINOD KAUSHIKvsALI AHMED KHAN

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 01, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment