CAT - Delhi

Contempt proceedings stand closed and notices discharged upon due compliance with the court's directions.

RAMESH KUMAR SHARMA vs SH. RAJESH KUMAR SINGH, SECRETARY, DEFENCE

CAT - DelhiJUDGMENT: March 23, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The case involved 140 applicants, primarily technical staff (including FGM, MCM, and Electricians) employed in the office of the Garrison Engineer (U) (Electric Supply), Delhi Cantt

Source reference: p. 1-14

The applicants had previously filed an Original Application (OA No. 2628/2023) seeking specific reliefs.

Source reference: p. 1

Following the disposal of the OA, the applicants filed the present Contempt Petition (CP) alleging that the respondents had failed to implement the Tribunal's directions.

Source reference: p. 1, 15

The matter was heard on March 23, 2026

Source reference: p. 1, 15
02

Issues

1. Whether the respondents willfully disobeyed the directions passed by the Tribunal in OA No. 2628/2023, and whether the order has since been implemented

Source reference: p. 15
03

Law Applied

The Tribunal applied the principles of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (as applicable to Administrative Tribunals), which mandate that contempt proceedings may be closed if the contemnor demonstrates substantial compliance with the court's judicial directions

Source reference: p. 15
04

Reasoning

During the oral hearing, the Tribunal recorded the submissions made by the learned counsel representing both the applicants and the respondents.

Source reference: p. 15

Both parties stated, based on specific instructions from their respective clients, that the directions issued in the underlying Original Application had been "duly complied with"

Source reference: p. 15

Since the grievance regarding non-implementation was resolved through compliance, the Tribunal found no grounds to continue the contempt proceedings

Source reference: p. 15
05

Holding

The Tribunal held that since the order had been complied with, the Contempt Petition stood closed and the notices issued to the respondents were discharged

All pending Miscellaneous Applications (MAs) were disposed of, and no order was made regarding costs

Source reference: p. 15
CAT - Delhi

Original Court PDF

RAMESH KUMAR SHARMAvsSH. RAJESH KUMAR SINGH, SECRETARY, DEFENCE

CAT - Delhi · March 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment