CAT - ['Delhi']
Administrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Contempt proceedings were closed after the Tribunal found its directions fully complied with.

Ram Kishore Tyagi vs Sh. Sanjay Arora, Commissioner of Police, DELHI POLICE and anr

CAT - ['Delhi']JUDGMENT: October 08, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Contempt proceedings were closed after the Tribunal found its directions fully complied with.. Ram Kishore Tyagi vs Sh. Sanjay Arora, Commissioner of Police, DELHI POLICE and anr. CAT - ['Delhi']. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

In the underlying O.A., the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and directed that the applicant receive all consequential benefits, preferably within six weeks of receipt of a certified copy of the order dated 24 March 2026.

Source reference: p. 2

The applicant subsequently alleged wilful disobedience and instituted this contempt petition.

Source reference: p. 2

The respondents stated that they had deemed him to have continued in service from the date of dismissal, treated the suspension and post-dismissal periods until retirement as duty, and processed his revised pay, pension, promotions, MACP and other consequential benefits.

Source reference: pp. 2–3

Their affidavit further stated that the calculated amounts, including arrears, gratuity, pension arrears and leave encashment, had been credited to the applicant’s account.

Source reference: p. 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the respondents wilfully disobeyed the Tribunal’s directions dated 24 March 2026.

Source reference: p. 2

2. Whether the respondents’ actions constituted compliance with those directions, warranting closure of the contempt petition.

Source reference: pp. 2–3
03

Law Applied

The Tribunal’s order does not cite any statute, precedent or separate legal test.

Source reference: no citation

The relevant principle applied was whether the respondents had complied with the directions whose alleged wilful disobedience formed the basis of the contempt petition.

Source reference: p. 2

Those directions required the impugned orders to be set aside, the applicant to receive consequential benefits under the applicable rules and instructions, and compliance to be effected expeditiously, preferably within six weeks.

Source reference: p. 2
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal considered the respondents’ affidavit and the measures they reported, including deemed continuation in service, treatment of the relevant periods as duty, revision of pay and pension, grant of notional promotion and MACP benefits, and payment of calculated consequential dues.

Source reference: pp. 2–3

On that record, it was satisfied that its directions had been complied with and therefore found no basis to continue the contempt proceedings.

Source reference: p. 3
05

Holding

The Tribunal concluded that its directions had been complied with and closed the contempt petition.

It discharged the notices and disposed of any pending miscellaneous application.

Source reference: p. 3
CAT - ['Delhi']

Original Court PDF

Ram Kishore TyagivsSh. Sanjay Arora, Commissioner of Police, DELHI POLICE and anr

CAT - ['Delhi'] · October 08, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment