Karnataka High Court
Administrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Continuation of a rowdy-sheet entry must comply with prescribed procedural safeguards.

PRABHUGOUDA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 22, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Continuation of a rowdy-sheet entry must comply with prescribed procedural safeguards.. PRABHUGOUDA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner challenged the Deputy Superintendent of Police’s order dated 24 August 2017 entering his name in the Register of Rowdies and sought deletion of his name from the register.

Source reference: p. 2

He contended that the entry was made without following the requirements of the Karnataka Police Manual and without properly assessing whether his conduct fell within the meaning of “rowdy”.

Source reference: pp. 3–4

The State supported the entry, submitting that it was based on the petitioner’s alleged involvement in criminal cases and activities detrimental to public peace.

Source reference: p. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the petitioner’s continued inclusion in the Register of Rowdies required reconsideration in light of the applicable legal requirements and guidelines.

Source reference: pp. 5, 7

2. Whether the impugned order met the requirements governing the opening and continuation of a rowdy sheet.

Source reference: pp. 5, 7
03

Law Applied

Order 1059 of the Karnataka Police Manual governs the opening of a Register of Rowdies, including the required approval and consideration of relevant material; Order 1057(2) provides for periodic review of entries.

Source reference: pp. 5–6

In Sri B.S. Prakash v. State of Karnataka, W.P. No. 4504/2021, decided 22 April 2022, the Court laid down guidelines for opening and continuing rowdy/history sheets. These include collecting and considering relevant material, ordinarily giving the affected person notice and an opportunity to make a representation, recording reasons for approval, and periodically reviewing the entry.

Source reference: pp. 5–7
04

Reasoning

Applying the B.S. Prakash guidelines and the Karnataka Police Manual, the Court considered whether the impugned order justified continuation of the petitioner’s name in the register.

Source reference: p. 7

It found that the order did not meet the requirements of law and therefore held that the authorities must reconsider whether the petitioner’s name should remain in the Register of Rowdies, following the prescribed guidelines.

Source reference: p. 7
05

Holding

The writ petition was allowed.

The Court issued a mandamus directing respondent No. 2 to reconsider whether the petitioner’s name should continue in the Register of Rowdies, in accordance with B.S. Prakash, within three months of receiving a copy of the order.

Source reference: pp. 7–8

No order was made as to costs.

Source reference: pp. 7–8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.

Karnataka Police Manual1

Section 1059
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

PRABHUGOUDAvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · September 22, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment