Madras High Court
Administrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Court Closed Compliance Proceedings After the University Filed a Writ Appeal Against Its Directions.

P.Vellaichamy vs The State of Tamil nadu

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: October 12, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Court Closed Compliance Proceedings After the University Filed a Writ Appeal Against Its Directions.. P.Vellaichamy vs The State of Tamil nadu. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, a Professor (Tamil), challenged his transfer from Madurai to Kumulur and subsequent deputation orders.

Source reference: no citation

In an earlier order in this writ petition, the Court directed Tamil Nadu Agricultural University to take steps to fill vacancies within three months of receipt of that order and, in any event, before the next academic year; it further stated that admissions should not be made to courses if the vacancies remained unfilled

Source reference: p.4

The matter was listed on 12 October 2026 for reporting compliance.

Source reference: no citation

The University informed the Court that it had filed a writ appeal against the earlier order, WA(MD) No. 1667 of 2026

Source reference: p.5
02

Issues

Whether the writ petition should remain listed for reporting compliance after the University informed the Court that it had appealed the earlier order

Source reference: p.5

Whether any further compliance direction was required in the present proceeding

Source reference: p.5
03

Law Applied

The order does not set out or apply a substantive statutory provision, legal test, or precedent.

Source reference: no citation

It records that the petition was before the Court for reporting compliance with its earlier directions and notes the University’s submission that those directions were under challenge in a writ appeal

Source reference: pp.4–5

Although the petition was brought under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Court did not analyse the scope of that jurisdiction in this order

Source reference: p.2
04

Reasoning

The Court noted the University’s submission that WA(MD) No. 1667 of 2026 had been filed against the earlier order containing the vacancy-filling directions

Source reference: p.5

In light of that subsequent development, it closed the writ petition without making a further finding on compliance or issuing additional directions

Source reference: p.5
05

Holding

The Court closed the writ petition in view of the filing of the writ appeal

It made no further order on compliance with the earlier vacancy-filling directions.

Source reference: p.5
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

P.VellaichamyvsThe State of Tamil nadu

Madras High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment