Facts
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking the quashing of FIR No. 322 of 2022 registered at Police Station City Kotwali, Mungeli, for offences under Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)
Source reference: para. 2The complainant alleged that Petitioner No. 1, while assisting in the medical treatment of the complainant’s mother, gained access to an ATM card and illegally withdrew Rs. 6,96,936/-
Source reference: para. 3The petitioners contended that the transactions occurred between 2016 and 2020 with parental consent for domestic and medical purposes, and the FIR was registered after an inordinate delay in 2022
Source reference: para. 4-6Furthermore, the petitioners argued that despite the lapse of over three years since the FIR, no charge-sheet had been filed
Source reference: para. 4Issues
1. Whether the FIR and pending investigation should be quashed on the grounds of being illegal, arbitrary, or involving civil disputes dressed as criminal offences
Source reference: para. 3, 62. Whether the delay in the investigation and the registration of the FIR warrants the acquittal or discharge of the petitioners at this stage
Source reference: para. 2, 4Law Applied
The court applied the principle that the inherent jurisdiction to quash an FIR must be exercised sparingly and with circumspection, specifically only when the allegations do not disclose an offence or represent an abuse of the process of law
Source reference: para. 9The court referenced Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 (the successor to Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.), regarding the High Court's inherent powers
Source reference: para. 2It further relied on the procedural requirements for filing a police report under Section 173(2) of the Cr.P.C., now corresponding to Section 193(3) of the BNSS, 2023
Source reference: para. 11Reasoning
The Court observed that the investigation into the alleged financial misappropriation was still pending and a final police report had not yet been filed
Source reference: para. 10It declined to examine disputed questions of fact or the merits of the allegations, noting that doing so at this stage might prejudice the ongoing investigation
Source reference: para. 10The Court acknowledged the petitioners' grievance regarding the protracted nature of the proceedings, noting that the FIR had been registered in 2022 and remained unresolved by 2026
Source reference: para. 10Consequently, while the Court found no grounds for the immediate quashing of the FIR, it determined that judicial intervention was necessary to ensure the timely completion of the statutory investigation process
Source reference: para. 10-11Holding
The High Court declined to quash the FIR but disposed of the petition with a mandatory direction to the Investigating Officer to complete the investigation and submit the final report under Section 193(3) of the BNSS (formerly Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.) within four weeks
The Court further granted the petitioners liberty to challenge the final police report before the competent forum if they remain aggrieved
Source reference: para. 12-13Original Court PDF
JAI KUMAR DEWANGAN (IN PERSON)vsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in