Chhattisgarh High Court

Court Declines Quashing of FIR, Directing Completion of Long-Pending Investigation Within Four Weeks

JAI KUMAR DEWANGAN (IN PERSON) vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 23, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners filed a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking the quashing of FIR No. 322 of 2022 registered at Police Station City Kotwali, Mungeli, for offences under Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)

Source reference: para. 2

The complainant alleged that Petitioner No. 1, while assisting in the medical treatment of the complainant’s mother, gained access to an ATM card and illegally withdrew Rs. 6,96,936/-

Source reference: para. 3

The petitioners contended that the transactions occurred between 2016 and 2020 with parental consent for domestic and medical purposes, and the FIR was registered after an inordinate delay in 2022

Source reference: para. 4-6

Furthermore, the petitioners argued that despite the lapse of over three years since the FIR, no charge-sheet had been filed

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the FIR and pending investigation should be quashed on the grounds of being illegal, arbitrary, or involving civil disputes dressed as criminal offences

Source reference: para. 3, 6

2. Whether the delay in the investigation and the registration of the FIR warrants the acquittal or discharge of the petitioners at this stage

Source reference: para. 2, 4
03

Law Applied

The court applied the principle that the inherent jurisdiction to quash an FIR must be exercised sparingly and with circumspection, specifically only when the allegations do not disclose an offence or represent an abuse of the process of law

Source reference: para. 9

The court referenced Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 (the successor to Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.), regarding the High Court's inherent powers

Source reference: para. 2

It further relied on the procedural requirements for filing a police report under Section 173(2) of the Cr.P.C., now corresponding to Section 193(3) of the BNSS, 2023

Source reference: para. 11
04

Reasoning

The Court observed that the investigation into the alleged financial misappropriation was still pending and a final police report had not yet been filed

Source reference: para. 10

It declined to examine disputed questions of fact or the merits of the allegations, noting that doing so at this stage might prejudice the ongoing investigation

Source reference: para. 10

The Court acknowledged the petitioners' grievance regarding the protracted nature of the proceedings, noting that the FIR had been registered in 2022 and remained unresolved by 2026

Source reference: para. 10

Consequently, while the Court found no grounds for the immediate quashing of the FIR, it determined that judicial intervention was necessary to ensure the timely completion of the statutory investigation process

Source reference: para. 10-11
05

Holding

The High Court declined to quash the FIR but disposed of the petition with a mandatory direction to the Investigating Officer to complete the investigation and submit the final report under Section 193(3) of the BNSS (formerly Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.) within four weeks

The Court further granted the petitioners liberty to challenge the final police report before the competent forum if they remain aggrieved

Source reference: para. 12-13
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

JAI KUMAR DEWANGAN (IN PERSON)vsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment