Facts
The applicant, Dimple Yadav, applied for the post of Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT)/Primary Teacher in the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) Recruitment 2022. Despite securing high marks in the Computer Based Test (CBT), she was not selected
Source reference: p. 2Alleging a lack of transparency in the selection process, she submitted a representation dated 06.11.2025 to the respondents, seeking disclosure of interview marks, category-wise cut-offs, and final evaluation criteria
Source reference: p. 3The respondents failed to dispose of the said representation, prompting the applicant to file the present Original Application (OA) seeking directions for disclosure of records, the reservation of one post, and potential retrospective appointment
Source reference: p. 2Issues
Whether the respondents are obligated to consider and decide upon the applicant’s pending representation regarding the transparency of the recruitment process within a stipulated timeframe
Source reference: p. 3Law Applied
Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, which empowers individuals aggrieved by orders pertaining to any matter within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to make an application for redressal
Source reference: p. 2the principle of administrative accountability, which requires competent authorities to dispose of pending representations through reasoned and speaking orders
Source reference: p. 3Reasoning
The Tribunal observed that the applicant’s primary grievance stemmed from the non-disposal of her representation dated 06.11.2025
Source reference: p. 3Without delving into the merits of the allegations regarding the recruitment process or the marks secured, the Tribunal noted the statement made by the applicant's counsel that the applicant would be satisfied with a direction for the timely disposal of said representation
Source reference: p. 3Consequently, the Tribunal determined that the most equitable course of action was to compel the respondents to exercise their administrative duty to address the applicant's grievances through a formal, reasoned decision
Source reference: p. 3Holding
The Tribunal disposed of the O.A. at the admission stage without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case
It directed the competent authority among the respondents to consider and dispose of the applicant’s representation dated 06.11.2025 by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with the law within thirty days of receiving a certified copy of the order
Source reference: p. 3Any pending Miscellaneous Applications (MAs) were also disposed of, with no orders as to costs
Source reference: p. 4Original Court PDF
DIMPLE YADAVvsDEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITRACY
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in