CAT - ['Delhi']

Court Directs Disposal of Representation Seeking Disclosure of Recruitment Marks and Evaluation Criteria

DIMPLE YADAV vs DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITRACY

CAT - ['Delhi']JUDGMENT: May 05, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Dimple Yadav, applied for the post of Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT)/Primary Teacher in the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) Recruitment 2022. Despite securing high marks in the Computer Based Test (CBT), she was not selected

Source reference: p. 2

Alleging a lack of transparency in the selection process, she submitted a representation dated 06.11.2025 to the respondents, seeking disclosure of interview marks, category-wise cut-offs, and final evaluation criteria

Source reference: p. 3

The respondents failed to dispose of the said representation, prompting the applicant to file the present Original Application (OA) seeking directions for disclosure of records, the reservation of one post, and potential retrospective appointment

Source reference: p. 2
02

Issues

Whether the respondents are obligated to consider and decide upon the applicant’s pending representation regarding the transparency of the recruitment process within a stipulated timeframe

Source reference: p. 3
03

Law Applied

Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, which empowers individuals aggrieved by orders pertaining to any matter within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to make an application for redressal

Source reference: p. 2

the principle of administrative accountability, which requires competent authorities to dispose of pending representations through reasoned and speaking orders

Source reference: p. 3
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal observed that the applicant’s primary grievance stemmed from the non-disposal of her representation dated 06.11.2025

Source reference: p. 3

Without delving into the merits of the allegations regarding the recruitment process or the marks secured, the Tribunal noted the statement made by the applicant's counsel that the applicant would be satisfied with a direction for the timely disposal of said representation

Source reference: p. 3

Consequently, the Tribunal determined that the most equitable course of action was to compel the respondents to exercise their administrative duty to address the applicant's grievances through a formal, reasoned decision

Source reference: p. 3
05

Holding

The Tribunal disposed of the O.A. at the admission stage without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case

It directed the competent authority among the respondents to consider and dispose of the applicant’s representation dated 06.11.2025 by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with the law within thirty days of receiving a certified copy of the order

Source reference: p. 3

Any pending Miscellaneous Applications (MAs) were also disposed of, with no orders as to costs

Source reference: p. 4
CAT - ['Delhi']

Original Court PDF

DIMPLE YADAVvsDEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITRACY

CAT - ['Delhi'] · May 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment