Facts
The petitioner approached the High Court seeking relief against coercive recovery proceedings initiated by Federal Bank Ltd. under the SARFAESI Act, 2002
Source reference: p. 1-2The bank had obtained an order from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kollam (MC No. 450/2026), and an Advocate Commissioner had issued a notice for possession dated 02.05.2026
Source reference: Exhibits P1 & P2; p. 5The total outstanding liability as of 21.05.2026 was quantified at ₹53,47,313/-
Source reference: p. 3The petitioner sought an opportunity to liquidate the debt in installments
Source reference: p. 2Issues
1. Whether the court should exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 to grant the petitioner an installment facility to clear the debt and stay coercive proceedings under the SARFAESI Act
Source reference: p. 3Law Applied
The court exercised its equitable jurisdiction in matters relating to the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act)
Source reference: p. 2While the Act provides a stringent mechanism for the enforcement of security interests, the court applied the principle of judicial discretion to allow a defaulting borrower to regularize or clear dues in installments when the secured creditor (the Bank) expresses no objection to such an arrangement, provided the repayment schedule is beneficial to the recovery process
Source reference: p. 2-3Reasoning
The Court evaluated the petitioner's request for leniency against the Bank's stance. The Standing Counsel for the Bank submitted that there was no objection to permitting the petitioner to clear the entire outstanding amount via installments, noting that such a recovery would be beneficial to the institution
Source reference: para. 3Based on this consensus and the specific facts and circumstances of the default, the Court reasoned that granting a structured repayment plan would balance the interests of both parties
Source reference: para. 4The Court determined that a sum of ₹5,00,000/- should be paid as an upfront commitment, with the remainder spread over six months to ensure timely liquidation of the debt
Source reference: para. 4(i)-(ii)Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner an installment facility to clear the total debt of ₹53,47,313/- plus interest
The Court ordered: 1. A payment of ₹5,00,000/- on or before 10.06.2026; 2. The balance to be paid in 6 equal monthly installments starting July 2026, due by the 15th of every month; 3. Coercive steps are to be stayed provided the petitioner complies with these conditions; however, any default in a single installment allows the respondent to resume recovery proceedings as per law
Source reference: para. 4(i)-(iii)Original Court PDF
RAHINA SvsTHE AUTHORIZED OFFICER
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in