Chhattisgarh High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Courts may enhance injury compensation for treatment-period income loss and unreceipted incidental expenses.

DEV SINGH vs PRADEEP DHANWAR

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 14, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Courts may enhance injury compensation for treatment-period income loss and unreceipted incidental expenses.. DEV SINGH vs PRADEEP DHANWAR. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellant sustained skull fractures and other injuries in a road accident on 16 April 2025.

Source reference: para. 2

He was treated as an inpatient for approximately five days and produced medical bills totalling Rs. 52,571, but no evidence of permanent disability.

Source reference: para. 2

The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 75,071.

Source reference: para. 3

The appellant appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement, including compensation for loss of income during treatment.

Source reference: para. 2

The insurer opposed the appeal, maintaining that the award was just and proper.

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal was inadequate and warranted enhancement in light of the appellant’s injuries and treatment expenses.

Source reference: para. 3

2. Whether the appellant was entitled to compensation for loss of income during the period of treatment.

Source reference: para. 3
03

Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, provides for an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: para. 2

In assessing compensation, the Court considered the documented medical expenses and also recognised that an injured claimant may incur reasonable miscellaneous expenses during hospitalisation and treatment that are not supported by formal receipts.

Source reference: para. 6
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the claimant’s skull fractures and other injuries, together with his five-day hospital stay, supported an increase in certain compensation heads, although no permanent disability was established.

Source reference: para. 6

It retained the documented medical expenses as the basis for the medical-expense award but rounded that amount up from Rs. 52,571 to Rs. 55,000, and increased the amounts for an attendant, transportation and special diet, and physical and mental agony.

Source reference: para. 6

It also awarded Rs. 10,000 for loss of income during treatment, which the Tribunal had not allowed.

Source reference: para. 7
05

Holding

The appeal was partly allowed, and the total compensation was enhanced from Rs. 75,071 to Rs. 1,05,000.

The appellant was awarded an additional Rs. 29,929, carrying interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim application until realisation; the remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left unchanged.

Source reference: para. 9
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

DEV SINGHvsPRADEEP DHANWAR

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 14, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment