Chhattisgarh High Court
Criminal LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Criminal antecedents justify denying bail despite parity with co-accused.

YOGESH PANDEY @ BHURU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: September 28, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Criminal antecedents justify denying bail despite parity with co-accused.. YOGESH PANDEY @ BHURU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicants sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Crime No. 359/2026, registered at Police Station Sakri for alleged offences under Sections 140(3), 308(5) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Source reference: para. 1

The prosecution alleged that the accused, impersonating police officers, abducted and confined young men, threatened them and attempted to extort money.

Source reference: para. 2

The applicants submitted that they had been falsely implicated, had been in custody since 4 June 2026, and that the charge-sheet had been filed; they also relied on bail granted to two co-accused.

Source reference: para. 3

The State opposed bail, citing three criminal antecedents against Applicant No. 1 and two against Applicant No. 2, and distinguishing the co-accused as having no antecedents.

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicants should be released on regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, having regard to the allegations and circumstances of the case.

Source reference: paras. 1, 5–6

2. Whether the bail granted to the co-accused warranted similar treatment for the applicants despite their criminal antecedents.

Source reference: paras. 3–6
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides the basis for the High Court’s consideration of an application for regular bail.

Source reference: para. 1

In deciding the application, the Court considered the nature and gravity of the allegations, the applicants’ criminal antecedents and the circumstances in which bail had been granted to the co-accused.

Source reference: para. 6

The order cites no precedent or further statutory test

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the allegations and the applicants’ criminal antecedents, including that a similar case registered in 2026 remained pending before the trial court.

Source reference: para. 6

It found the applicants’ circumstances distinguishable from those of the co-accused: the co-accused had been granted bail after filing of the charge-sheet and had no criminal antecedents, whereas the applicants had antecedents.

Source reference: para. 6

On that basis, the Court declined to grant bail.

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The Court rejected the applicants’ first application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
06

Acts & Sections Cited

4 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20233

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

YOGESH PANDEY @ BHURUvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · September 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment