Facts
The applicants sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Crime No. 359/2026, registered at Police Station Sakri for alleged offences under Sections 140(3), 308(5) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Source reference: para. 1The prosecution alleged that the accused, impersonating police officers, abducted and confined young men, threatened them and attempted to extort money.
Source reference: para. 2The applicants submitted that they had been falsely implicated, had been in custody since 4 June 2026, and that the charge-sheet had been filed; they also relied on bail granted to two co-accused.
Source reference: para. 3The State opposed bail, citing three criminal antecedents against Applicant No. 1 and two against Applicant No. 2, and distinguishing the co-accused as having no antecedents.
Source reference: para. 4Issues
1. Whether the applicants should be released on regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, having regard to the allegations and circumstances of the case.
Source reference: paras. 1, 5–62. Whether the bail granted to the co-accused warranted similar treatment for the applicants despite their criminal antecedents.
Source reference: paras. 3–6Law Applied
Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides the basis for the High Court’s consideration of an application for regular bail.
Source reference: para. 1In deciding the application, the Court considered the nature and gravity of the allegations, the applicants’ criminal antecedents and the circumstances in which bail had been granted to the co-accused.
Source reference: para. 6The order cites no precedent or further statutory test
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The Court considered the allegations and the applicants’ criminal antecedents, including that a similar case registered in 2026 remained pending before the trial court.
Source reference: para. 6It found the applicants’ circumstances distinguishable from those of the co-accused: the co-accused had been granted bail after filing of the charge-sheet and had no criminal antecedents, whereas the applicants had antecedents.
Source reference: para. 6On that basis, the Court declined to grant bail.
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The Court rejected the applicants’ first application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Acts & Sections Cited
4 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20233
Original Court PDF
YOGESH PANDEY @ BHURUvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
