Uttarakhand High Court

Criminal proceedings for defamation under Section 500 IPC quashed based on amicable settlement and compounding.

AAKANKSHA GULERIA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand High CourtJUDGMENT: June 05, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Aakanksha Guleria, sought the quashing of a summoning order dated 08.08.2023 and the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 17 of 2023, titled “Kamal Sharma vs. Aakansha,” pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Mussoorie.

Source reference: para. 1

The complaint alleged defamation under Section 500 of the IPC.

Source reference: no citation

During the pendency of the Section 482 Cr.P.C. application, both parties filed a joint compounding application (IA No. 3 of 2026) stating that all disputes, including past, present, and future grievances, had been amicably settled.

Source reference: para. 3

The respondent no. 2 (complainant) expressed her lack of objection to quashing the proceedings and committed to facilitating the withdrawal of a related defamation case in Pune.

Source reference: para. 3-4
02

Issues

1. Whether the High Court should exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the criminal proceedings for an offence under Section 500 IPC based on a private settlement and compounding application between the parties.

Source reference: para. 1, 8
03

Law Applied

Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), which saves the inherent powers of the High Court to prevent abuse of the process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice.

Source reference: para. 1

Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) regarding punishment for defamation, noting that such offences are essentially private in nature and can be compounded when parties arrive at a settlement.

Source reference: para. 3, 10
04

Reasoning

The court conducted a physical and video-conferencing interaction with both the applicant and the respondent no. 2 to verify the voluntariness of the settlement.

Source reference: para. 2, 6, 7

The court observed that the respondent no. 2 had filed a supporting affidavit confirming that all claims and causes of action were resolved and that she no longer wished to pursue the prosecution.

Source reference: para. 3

Additionally, the court took note of a reciprocal undertaking by the complainant’s daughter to withdraw a connected case in Pune.

Source reference: para. 4

Since the dispute was personal and the parties had reached a comprehensive settlement, the court reasoned that allowing the prosecution to continue would serve no purpose and that compounding the offence would meet the ends of justice.

Source reference: para. 8, 10
05

Holding

The court answered the issue in the affirmative, allowing the compounding application (IA No. 3 of 2026).

The court held that in light of the amicable settlement, the summoning order dated 08.08.2023 and the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 17 of 2023 are quashed.

Source reference: para. 10

The Section 482 application was disposed of accordingly.

Source reference: para. 10
Uttarakhand High Court

Original Court PDF

AAKANKSHA GULERIAvsSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand High Court · June 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment