Chhattisgarh High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Deceased workers’ income in accident claims must reflect applicable notified minimum wages.

SMT. MOTI MARKAM vs DEVARAM PODIYAMI,

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 05, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Deceased workers’ income in accident claims must reflect applicable notified minimum wages.. SMT. MOTI MARKAM vs DEVARAM PODIYAMI,. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Sukkaram Markam, aged about 35, died in a road accident on 22 September 2020.

Source reference: para. 1–3

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dantewada, awarded his claimants compensation of ₹18,60,336.

Source reference: para. 1–3

The claimants appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement, principally on the ground that the deceased’s income had been assessed too low.

Source reference: para. 1–3

The insurer opposed the appeal and argued that the amount awarded under conventional heads was excessive

Source reference: para. 1–3
02

Issues

Whether the Tribunal assessed the deceased’s income too low, requiring enhancement of the compensation

Source reference: para. 2, 5

Whether the amount awarded under conventional heads should be reduced in light of the applicable enhancement under *Pranay Sethi*

Source reference: para. 3, 6–7
03

Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: para. 1

Under *National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi*, conventional sums for loss of estate, loss of consortium and funeral expenses are ₹15,000, ₹40,000 and ₹15,000 respectively, subject to a 10% enhancement every three years.

Source reference: para. 3, 6

The Court also relied on *Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation* for the applicable multiplier and deduction principles, and *Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram* in assessing consortium.

Source reference: para. 8
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the Tribunal had used a monthly income of ₹7,710, whereas the applicable Chhattisgarh minimum-wage notification supported monthly income of ₹8,860.

Source reference: para. 5, 8

Applying a 40% addition for future prospects, a one-fourth deduction for personal expenses, and a multiplier of 16, the Court calculated the dependency compensation at ₹17,86,176.

Source reference: para. 5, 8

For an accident in 2020, it applied a 10% enhancement to the conventional amounts, fixing loss of estate and funeral expenses at ₹16,500 each and consortium at ₹44,000 for each of five claimants.

Source reference: para. 6–8

The resulting total of ₹2,53,000 under conventional heads was lower than the Tribunal’s award of ₹3,06,000.

Source reference: para. 6–8
05

Holding

The Court partly allowed the appeal and enhanced total compensation from ₹18,60,336 to ₹20,39,176.

The claimants were awarded an additional ₹1,78,840, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim application until realization.

Source reference: para. 9–11

The remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left unchanged, and the Registry was directed to communicate the enhancement to the claimants in Hindi.

Source reference: para. 9–11
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT. MOTI MARKAMvsDEVARAM PODIYAMI,

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment