01Facts
The petitioner, a street vendor holding a Certificate of Vending (COV) under the category “Food/Snack with gas cylinder/fire,” sought a direction permitting her to vend peacefully at a designated spot beside DAV School near Nizamuddin Railway Station.
pp. 1–2The Municipal Corporation of Delhi produced photographs which, according to the Court, showed the petitioner operating a roadside restaurant, using a large gas cylinder and encroaching on public space.
pp. 3–4The Court also found that the petitioner’s photographs were misleading.
pp. 3–402Issues
i.Whether the petitioner was entitled to a direction permitting her to vend peacefully at the designated spot.
pp. 1–2ii.Whether the petitioner’s manner of vending, as shown in the photographs produced by the MCD, entitled her to relief under Article 226.
pp. 3–403Law Applied
The Court considered the petitioner’s request for writ relief under Article 226 of the Constitution and the terms and conditions governing her COV.
pp. 1–2, 4The judgment cites no specific statute, precedent, or further legal test; it proceeds on the basis that vending must comply with the COV’s terms and conditions and that authorities may act where those conditions are violated.
p. 404Reasoning
The Court compared the petitioner’s account and photographs with the MCD’s photographs, which it considered to show that she was operating a dhaba on the pavement rather than vending within the limits of her COV.
pp. 2–4It found that she had misled the Court, used a large gas cylinder and encroached on public space; accordingly, it held that she could not obtain relief to continue vending in that manner.
p. 405Holding
The Court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner was not entitled to the requested relief.
pp. 4–5It clarified that the authorities remained entitled to take action if she violated the terms and conditions of her COV; pending applications, if any, were disposed of.
pp. 4–5Original Court PDF
Manisha KhatoonvsCommissioner Of Police And Ors
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
