CAT - ['Delhi']

Delhi Police Constable Aspirant To Get Fresh Height Test After PE&MT Recorded 164.5 Cm And Hospital Measurement 166 Cm

ChandanSingh MoolSingh Rathore vs STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION (SSC)

CAT - ['Delhi']JUDGMENT: October 15, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Delhi Police Constable Aspirant To Get Fresh Height Test After PE&MT Recorded 164.5 Cm And Hospital Measurement 166 Cm. ChandanSingh MoolSingh Rathore vs STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION (SSC). CAT - ['Delhi']. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, a candidate for Constable (Executive) Male in the Delhi Police Examination, 2025, was shortlisted for the Physical Endurance and Measurement Test (PE&MT).

Source reference: p.2–3

At the PE&MT on 29 September 2026, his height was recorded as 164.1 cm; a same-day remeasurement recorded 164.5 cm.

Source reference: p.2–3

He subsequently obtained a measurement of 166 cm at a government hospital and emailed the Delhi Police seeking reconsideration.

Source reference: p.2–3

He relied on an earlier Tribunal order concerning a height-measurement dispute and sought fresh measurement and permission to continue in the selection process.

Source reference: p.3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant’s height should be measured afresh in accordance with the applicable rules and the methodology used for other candidates.

Source reference: p.4

2. Whether consequential steps should be taken regarding the applicant’s participation in the PE&MT and, if he qualifies, his further consideration for appointment.

Source reference: p.4–5
03

Law Applied

The application was brought under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

Source reference: p.2

The Tribunal directed that the applicant’s height be measured strictly in accordance with the applicable rules and instructions and using the methodology adopted for other candidates in the Constable (Executive) Male selection.

Source reference: p.4

The applicant cited Mukul Choudhary v. SSC & Ors., O.A. No. 503/2024, in support of fresh measurement; the Tribunal’s order does not otherwise set out or rely on a specific statutory height standard or discuss that precedent as a binding rule.

Source reference: p.3
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal considered the discrepancy between the two departmental measurements and the applicant’s subsequent government-hospital measurement.

Source reference: p.3–5

Rather than accept the external measurement as conclusive or determine the applicant’s eligibility itself, it found that the interests of justice required a fresh measurement under the governing rules and by the same methodology used for other candidates.

Source reference: p.3–5

The outcome of that measurement would determine the necessary consequential action concerning his PE&MT participation.

Source reference: p.3–5
05

Holding

The Tribunal disposed of the application with directions that the respondents arrange a fresh height measurement at an appropriate institution, using both digital and manual methods and complying with the applicable rules and instructions, within three weeks of receiving the order.

Within one week after the measurement, the respondents must take consequential action regarding the applicant’s PE&MT participation.

Source reference: p.5

If he meets the height requirement, he must be permitted to undertake the PE&MT; if successful, he is entitled to appointment subject to fulfilling the other eligibility conditions.

Source reference: p.5

There was no order as to costs, and any pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of.

Source reference: p.5
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Administrative Tribunals Act, 19851

CAT - ['Delhi']

Original Court PDF

ChandanSingh MoolSingh RathorevsSTAFF SELECTION COMMISSION (SSC)

CAT - ['Delhi'] · October 15, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment