Chhattisgarh High Court
Criminal LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Disposed criminal antecedents do not preclude bail where the chargesheet is filed and trial is likely to take time.

RAHUL JOSHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 05, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Disposed criminal antecedents do not preclude bail where the chargesheet is filed and trial is likely to take time.. RAHUL JOSHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant was arrested in connection with Crime No. 144/2026, registered for offences under Sections 296, 351(2), 221, 121(1), 132, 324(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).

Source reference: para. 1

The prosecution alleged that, while responding to a quarrel during his Dial-112 duty, the complainant was abused and assaulted by the applicant and others, and the police vehicle was damaged.

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant denied the allegations, submitted that his nine criminal antecedents had all been disposed of, and relied on the filing of the charge-sheet and his custody since 13 June 2026.

Source reference: para. 3

The State opposed bail, citing the antecedents and alleged obstruction of police officers in the discharge of their duties.

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), having regard to the circumstances of the case, his criminal antecedents, the filing of the charge-sheet and the likely duration of trial?

Source reference: paras. 1, 3–6
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the BNSS provides the High Court with power to grant bail.

Source reference: para. 1

In exercising that power, the Court considered the relevant circumstances, including whether any criminal antecedent remained pending, whether the charge-sheet had been filed, the period of custody and the likely time for conclusion of trial.

Source reference: para. 6

The order cites no precedent.

Source reference: no citation

Its bail conditions also refer to Sections 84 and 351 of the BNSS and Sections 269 and 209 of the BNS.

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The Court treated the applicant’s antecedents as no longer pending because all nine had been disposed of.

Source reference: paras. 3, 6

It also noted that the charge-sheet had been filed, the applicant had been in custody since 13 June 2026, and the trial was likely to take time.

Source reference: paras. 3, 6

On those considerations, it found sufficient basis to grant bail notwithstanding the State’s opposition.

Source reference: paras. 4, 6
05

Holding

The Court allowed the bail application and directed the applicant’s release on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety for the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Release was subject to conditions concerning adjournments, attendance at trial, compliance with any proclamation, and personal appearance at specified stages of the proceedings.

Source reference: para. 7
06

Acts & Sections Cited

12 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20233

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20239 provisions
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

RAHUL JOSHIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment