Facts
The applicant was arrested in connection with Crime No. 144/2026, registered for offences under Sections 296, 351(2), 221, 121(1), 132, 324(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).
Source reference: para. 1The prosecution alleged that, while responding to a quarrel during his Dial-112 duty, the complainant was abused and assaulted by the applicant and others, and the police vehicle was damaged.
Source reference: para. 2The applicant denied the allegations, submitted that his nine criminal antecedents had all been disposed of, and relied on the filing of the charge-sheet and his custody since 13 June 2026.
Source reference: para. 3The State opposed bail, citing the antecedents and alleged obstruction of police officers in the discharge of their duties.
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), having regard to the circumstances of the case, his criminal antecedents, the filing of the charge-sheet and the likely duration of trial?
Source reference: paras. 1, 3–6Law Applied
Section 483 of the BNSS provides the High Court with power to grant bail.
Source reference: para. 1In exercising that power, the Court considered the relevant circumstances, including whether any criminal antecedent remained pending, whether the charge-sheet had been filed, the period of custody and the likely time for conclusion of trial.
Source reference: para. 6The order cites no precedent.
Source reference: no citationIts bail conditions also refer to Sections 84 and 351 of the BNSS and Sections 269 and 209 of the BNS.
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The Court treated the applicant’s antecedents as no longer pending because all nine had been disposed of.
Source reference: paras. 3, 6It also noted that the charge-sheet had been filed, the applicant had been in custody since 13 June 2026, and the trial was likely to take time.
Source reference: paras. 3, 6On those considerations, it found sufficient basis to grant bail notwithstanding the State’s opposition.
Source reference: paras. 4, 6Holding
The Court allowed the bail application and directed the applicant’s release on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety for the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Release was subject to conditions concerning adjournments, attendance at trial, compliance with any proclamation, and personal appearance at specified stages of the proceedings.
Source reference: para. 7Acts & Sections Cited
12 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20233
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
Original Court PDF
RAHUL JOSHIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
