Chhattisgarh High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Each claimant is entitled to individual consortium, with conventional heads enhanced by 10%.

VIJAY KUMAR PATIL vs VINAYAK PATEL

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 12, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Each claimant is entitled to individual consortium, with conventional heads enhanced by 10%.. VIJAY KUMAR PATIL vs VINAYAK PATEL. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Gore Lal Patil died from injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on 25 January 2022.

Source reference: para. 2–9

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Pathalgaon, awarded his claimants compensation of ₹32,95,000 by award dated 31 January 2025.

Source reference: para. 2–9

The claimants appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation under the conventional heads.

Source reference: para. 2–9

The appeal was filed 344 days late; the High Court condoned the delay and heard the appeal finally with the parties’ consent.

Source reference: para. 2–9

The Tribunal had awarded ₹15,000 for loss of estate, ₹15,000 for funeral expenses, and ₹40,000 for loss of consortium.

Source reference: para. 13
02

Issues

Whether the 344-day delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.

Source reference: para. 2–4

Whether the compensation under the conventional heads required enhancement, including consortium for each of the six claimants.

Source reference: para. 10, 13–16
03

Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against an award of a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: para. 9

Applying National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680, the Court held that the amounts under the conventional heads of loss of estate and funeral expenses, and the amount for consortium, were to be enhanced by 10% in view of the accident date.

Source reference: para. 13

The Court further treated each of the six claimants as entitled to consortium of ₹44,000.

Source reference: para. 14
04

Reasoning

The Court accepted the reasons given in the delay-condonation application and allowed the 344-day delay.

Source reference: para. 4

On the merits, it found that the Tribunal’s conventional-head awards required a 10% enhancement under Pranay Sethi: loss of estate and funeral expenses were recalculated at ₹16,500 each, and consortium at ₹44,000 per claimant.

Source reference: para. 13–16

With six claimants, consortium totalled ₹2,64,000, making the revised conventional-head total ₹2,97,000.

Source reference: para. 13–16

After deducting the ₹70,000 already awarded, the claimants were entitled to an additional ₹2,27,000.

Source reference: para. 13–16
05

Holding

The High Court condoned the delay and partly allowed the appeal.

It enhanced compensation by ₹2,27,000, payable with interest at 6% per annum from 17 April 2026, the date the appeal was filed, until realization.

Source reference: para. 17–19

The remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left unchanged, and the Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimants in Hindi.

Source reference: para. 17–19
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

VIJAY KUMAR PATILvsVINAYAK PATEL

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment