Facts
The applicant was appointed as a Deputy Architect (Group ‘A’) in the Department of Telecommunication on February 13, 1995, and was later absorbed into BSNL on October 1, 2000
Source reference: p. 2He was promoted to the post of Architect on a regular basis on September 9, 2004, and subsequently to Senior Architect (adhoc) on December 1, 2008
Source reference: p. 2He sought the grant of a functional CDA pay scale (Rs. 14,300–18,300) effective from December 1, 2008, based on a Department of Personnel & Training (DoPT) Office Memorandum (OM) dated December 29, 2010, which granted such scales to Superintending Engineers (equivalent to Senior Architect) upon completing 13 years of Group ‘A’ service
Source reference: p. 2Consequently, he sought the E9 pay scale from January 1, 2013, instead of January 1, 2015
Source reference: p. 1The respondents rejected his representation on October 1, 2015, arguing that the BSNL Management Services (MS) Recruitment Rules (RR), 2009, which came into effect on June 11, 2009, governed his promotions and that he did not qualify for retrospective benefits under the DoPT OM
Source reference: p. 3-4Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the functional grade of Rs. 14,300–18,300 with effect from December 1, 2008, in accordance with the DoPT OM dated December 29, 2010
Source reference: p. 52. Whether the applicant's placement in the E9 pay scale (Additional General Manager) should be advanced to January 1, 2013, based on the revised date of his previous functional promotion
Source reference: p. 7Law Applied
The court applied the DoPT OM No. 22/1/2000-CRD dated December 29, 2010, which mandated the conversion of non-functional scales to "functional" grades for Superintending Engineers and equivalents in Organised Group ‘A’ Engineering Services upon completion of 13 years of regular Group ‘A’ service and 4 years in the Executive Engineer grade
Source reference: p. 4It further applied the BSNL MS RR 2009 (Schedule-I B), which stipulates that an Executive in the Joint General Manager grade is eligible for promotion to the Additional General Manager grade (E9 scale) upon completing 4 years of service in the lower grade
Source reference: p. 6The court also relied on the principle of parity, ensuring that members of the same Organised Group ‘A’ Engineering Service are treated equally regarding pay scale eligibility
Source reference: p. 5Reasoning
The Tribunal found that the applicant completed the required 13 years of regular Group ‘A’ service and 4 years in the Architect grade (equivalent to Executive Engineer) in the year 2008
Source reference: p. 5Crucially, the BSNL MS RR 2009 only became effective on June 11, 2009; therefore, the applicant had already acquired eligibility for the functional grade under the prevailing DoPT OM prior to the enforcement of the new BSNL rules
Source reference: p. 5The Tribunal rejected the respondents' contention that the applicant was not similarly situated to his peer, Rajeev Sharma, noting that both belonged to the Organised Group ‘A’ Engineering Services and were thus covered by the same DoPT mandate
Source reference: p. 5The court concluded that since the applicant was entitled to the functional grade from December 1, 2008, his subsequent residency period for the E9 scale must be calculated from that earlier date under the BSNL MS RR 2009
Source reference: p. 7Holding
The Tribunal allowed the Original Application and quashed the impugned order dated October 1, 2015
It held that the applicant is entitled to the functional grade of Rs. 14,300–18,300 with effect from December 1, 2008
Source reference: p. 7The respondents were directed to grant this grade and consequently consider advancing the date of the applicant’s placement in the Additional General Manager (E9) scale in accordance with BSNL MS RR 2009 within three months of the order
Source reference: p. 7Original Court PDF
SUDHIR KUMAR JAINvsUnion Of India
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in