Facts
The applicant, aged 65 years and a former employee of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS), superannuated from service on June 30, 2021.
Source reference: p. 2She sought the grant of one notional annual increment for the service period completed between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, which became due on July 1, 2021—the day immediately following her retirement.
Source reference: p. 1-2The applicant submitted representations to the respondents for the inclusion of this increment in her pensionary benefits and the issuance of a revised Pension Payment Order (PPO), but no relief was provided.
Source reference: p. 2Consequently, she approached the Tribunal seeking the increment, arrears with 12% interest, and a revised pension.
Source reference: p. 1-2Issues
1. Whether a government employee superannuating on 30th June is entitled to the benefit of a notional increment due on 1st July for the purpose of calculating pensionary benefits.
Source reference: p. 2, para 32. Whether the applicant is entitled to arrears of pension prior to May 1, 2023, in light of recent Supreme Court interim directions.
Source reference: p. 3, para 4Law Applied
The Tribunal primarily applied the precedent set by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL Ors. v. C.P. Mundinamani Ors. (2023) SSC Online SC 401, which held that notional increments must be granted to employees retiring on 30th June or 31st December for pensionary purposes.
Source reference: p. 3It further relied on the interim order dated September 6, 2024, in Union of India Anr. v. M. Siddaraj (Misc. Application Diary No. 2400/2024), which restricted the payment of enhanced pension for third parties to the period on or after May 1, 2023.
Source reference: p. 3-4Additionally, the court followed the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) Office Memorandum (OM) dated October 14, 2024, which operationalized these judicial directions for Central Government employees.
Source reference: p. 5Reasoning
The Tribunal found that the applicant's case was squarely covered by the principles established in C.P. Mundinamani, as she had completed a full year of service prior to her retirement on June 30th.
Source reference: p. 3However, the Tribunal noted that the implementation must align with the Supreme Court's interim directions in M. Siddaraj, which sought to prevent excessive litigation by standardizing the date of effectivity.
Source reference: p. 3-4Under these directions, "third parties" (those not part of the original litigation) are entitled to an enhanced pension only from May 1, 2023, and are explicitly barred from claiming arrears for the period prior to April 30, 2023.
Source reference: p. 5The Tribunal noted that its own previous decision in Jiwan Singh v. Union of India Anr. (OA No. 2391/2024) had already applied these standards.
Source reference: p. 4Since the legal position was settled and the DoPT had issued a clear OM on October 14, 2024, the Tribunal determined that the respondents were duty-bound to carry out the necessary re-calculation of the applicant's pensionary benefits.
Source reference: p. 6Holding
The Tribunal disposed of the Original Application and directed the respondents to grant the notional increment to the applicant for the purpose of pensionary benefits.
The respondents were ordered to complete this exercise in accordance with the judgment in Jiwan Singh (supra) and the DoPT OM dated October 14, 2024, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order.
Source reference: p. 6The holding implies that the applicant will receive an enhanced pension effective from May 1, 2023, without arrears for the period prior to that date.
Source reference: p. 5-6No costs were awarded.
Source reference: p. 6Original Court PDF
Shashi PrabhavsKENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN (KVS)
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in