Madras High Court
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Employers must pay 6% interest on delayed retirement benefits, even absent an express provision.

J.Krishnan vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: October 06, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Employers must pay 6% interest on delayed retirement benefits, even absent an express provision.. J.Krishnan vs The Government of Tamil Nadu. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, a retired Driving Instructor with the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, retired on 30 April 2025. His retirement benefits were paid on 11 March 2026.

Source reference: p. 2, para. 2

After his representation seeking interest for the delay received no response, he filed a writ petition seeking interest at 6% per annum from retirement until payment.

Source reference: p. 2, para. 2

The respondents confirmed that the benefits had been paid on 11 March 2026.

Source reference: p. 3, para. 4

The petition was taken up for final disposal by consent.

Source reference: p. 3, para. 5
02

Issues

Whether the petitioner was entitled to interest on retirement benefits paid belatedly.

Source reference: pp. 2–3, paras. 2–3, 7–9

If so, what rate and period of interest should apply.

Source reference: p. 5, para. 9
03

Law Applied

In S.K. Dua v. State of Haryana, (2008) 3 SCC 44, the Supreme Court held that an employee may claim interest on delayed retiral benefits under applicable statutory rules or administrative instructions; even absent such provisions, a claim may be founded on Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.

Source reference: pp. 3–4, para. 7

A Division Bench of the Madras High Court, in W.A.(MD) No. 403 of 2010 and connected matters, held that delayed payment of retirement benefits may attract interest notwithstanding the absence of an express provision, and fixed the rate at 6% per annum.

Source reference: pp. 4–5, para. 8
04

Reasoning

The petitioner’s benefits were paid only on 11 March 2026, after his retirement on 30 April 2025.

Source reference: p. 2, para. 2; p. 3, para. 4

Applying S.K. Dua and the Division Bench’s ruling concerning Transport Corporation employees, the Court held that retirement benefits should be paid promptly and that delay warrants compensation by way of interest, even where the governing rules do not expressly provide for it.

Source reference: pp. 3–5, paras. 7–9

It therefore applied the Division Bench’s 6% rate to the petitioner’s eligible benefits.

Source reference: pp. 3–5, paras. 7–9
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the respondents to pay interest at 6% per annum on the eligible retirement benefits disbursed belatedly, calculated from 1 May 2025 until the date of actual disbursement.

Payment was ordered within six months from receipt of a copy of the order; no costs were awarded.

Source reference: p. 5, para. 9
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

J.KrishnanvsThe Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras High Court · October 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment