CAT - ['Delhi']

Entitlement to Interest at GPF Rates on Delayed Retiral Benefits Due to Administrative Lapses.

SHRI KRISHAN vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

CAT - ['Delhi']JUDGMENT: April 28, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, an Assistant Malaria Inspector (AMI) with the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), superannuated on 31.05.2023.

Source reference: p. 2

He approached the Tribunal aggrieved by the respondents' failure to release several retiral dues, including gratuity, commutation of pension (CVP), leave encashment, and MACP arrears, within the stipulated period.

Source reference: p. 2

The respondents admitted that while some payments (like GPF and portions of gratuity) were released with delays in 2023 and 2024, certain dues—specifically 2nd MACP arrears (₹29,500), bonus for 2021–22 (₹6,908), and interest on delayed payments—remained unpaid due to a "shortage of funds".

Source reference: p. 2
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to interest on the delayed payment of retiral benefits and arrears.

Source reference: p. 3, para. 7

2. Whether the lack of funds is a valid defense for the non-payment of statutory pensionary dues.

Source reference: p. 2, para. 3
03

Law Applied

Rule 68 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (as updated by notification dated 20.12.2021), which mandates the payment of interest on delayed gratuity and pensionary benefits if the delay is not attributable to the employee.

Source reference: p. 4, para. 9

The precedent set by the Full Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal in Rajbir Singh v. MCD Ors. (OA No. 2821/2023, decided on 30.10.2025), which established that interest on delayed GPF, pension, and gratuity must be paid at the GPF rate for the relevant years, calculated as compound interest.

Source reference: p. 4, para. 9
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal noted that the respondents did not attribute any delay or lapse to the applicant; rather, the delay was admitted to be an administrative and financial failure on the part of the MCD.

Source reference: p. 3, para. 7

Applying the law from the Rajbir Singh Full Bench decision, the Tribunal reasoned that once a delay is established as fault of the employer, the employee is legally entitled to interest from the date of retirement until the actual date of payment.

Source reference: p. 3, para. 7, 10

The court rejected the implicit defense of financial hardship, emphasizing that statutory retiral benefits must be settled in accordance with the timelines and interest rates prescribed under the CCS (Pension) Rules.

Source reference: p. 3-4
05

Holding

The Tribunal allowed the OA and held that the applicant is entitled to interest on the delayed payments.

The respondents were directed to: (i) verify the case and grant the remaining arrears (MACP and Bonus); and (ii) calculate and pay interest on all delayed retiral benefits at the GPF rate (compounded) in terms of the Rajbir Singh judgment. This direction must be complied with within three months of receipt of the order. No order as to costs was made.

Source reference: p. 4, para. 10, 12
CAT - ['Delhi']

Original Court PDF

SHRI KRISHANvsMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

CAT - ['Delhi'] · April 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment