Gujarat High CourtCivil LawInsurance Law

Family Of Graphic Artist Killed In Crash Wins Rs 17.43 Lakh More As Gujarat HC Counts His Allowances As Income

SWATIBEN ASHWINSINH GOHILv.BACHUBHAI RAMESHBHAI VASAVA

Family Of Graphic Artist Killed In Crash Wins Rs 17.43 Lakh More As Gujarat HC Counts His Allowances As Income. SWATIBEN ASHWINSINH GOHIL vs BACHUBHAI RAMESHBHAI VASAVA. Gujarat High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the Tribunal erred in excluding components of the deceased’s remuneration when assessing his monthly income for calculating compensation.

The court held

The appeal was partly allowed.

It also directed

The claimants were awarded an additional Rs.17,43,063, with interest at 9% per annum from the date of the claim petition until realization.

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within ten weeks of receiving the order, for disbursement to the claimants upon verification by NEFT/RTGS.

01Facts

On 23 November 2013, a collision between a motorcycle and a truck killed the motorcycle rider, aged 26, who worked as a graphic artist.

¶ 1–2

His wife, minor child and mother filed a claim petition.

¶ 1–2

The Tribunal found the truck driver solely responsible and awarded Rs.21,04,000, assessing the deceased’s monthly income at Rs.9,218.

¶ 1–2

The insurer did not challenge the findings on negligence or quantum; the claimants appealed, arguing that the deceased’s full monthly remuneration of Rs.19,181, shown in his service agreement, should have been considered.

¶ 3–5

02Issues

i.Whether the Tribunal erred in excluding components of the deceased’s remuneration when assessing his monthly income for calculating compensation.

¶ 4–6

ii.Whether the claimants were entitled to enhanced compensation based on the deceased’s corrected income and the applicable multiplier and conventional heads.

¶ 7–10

03Law Applied

The Court applied the principle that, apart from professional tax, allowances forming part of the deceased’s emoluments should not be excluded when determining income for compensation.

¶ 5

It applied a multiplier of 17 for the deceased’s age of 26.

¶ 7

Relying on National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680, assessed consortium and other conventional heads.

¶ 8

04Reasoning

The service agreement recorded a gross salary of Rs.8,000 and additional components, including bonus, leave encashment, allowances and employer contributions, bringing the monthly total to Rs.19,181.

¶ 5

Applying the rule that such emoluments could not be excluded except for professional tax, the Court substituted Rs.19,181 for the Tribunal’s income assessment.

¶ 6

It then added 40% for prospective income, deducted one-third for personal expenses, applied a multiplier of 17, and added compensation for consortium, loss of estate and funeral expenses, resulting in total compensation of Rs.38,47,063.

¶ 7–9

05Holding

The appeal was partly allowed.

¶ 10–11

The claimants were awarded an additional Rs.17,43,063, with interest at 9% per annum from the date of the claim petition until realization.

¶ 10–11

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within ten weeks of receiving the order, for disbursement to the claimants upon verification by NEFT/RTGS.

¶ 10–11
Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

SWATIBEN ASHWINSINH GOHILvsBACHUBHAI RAMESHBHAI VASAVA

Gujarat High Court · November 02, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment