Facts
The applicant, Kishan Lal Banjare, was arrested on January 12, 2026, following a police raid in Lailunga, District Raigarh, where he was allegedly found in possession of 35 liters of illicit country-made mahua liquor stored in two jerricans.
Source reference: para 1-2He was charged under Sections 34(2) and 59(a) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act.
Source reference: para 1The applicant has three prior criminal antecedents.
Source reference: para 3The investigation is complete, the charge-sheet has been filed, and the applicant moved this First Bail Application under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
Source reference: para 1, 3Issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, given the nature of the offense and his criminal history.
Source reference: para 1, 6Law Applied
Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the grant of regular bail.
Source reference: para 1Sections 34(2) and 59(a) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, where the prescribed punishment ranges from one to three years of imprisonment.
Source reference: para 1, 3The Court also referenced procedural safeguards under the BNSS, including Section 269 (punishment for non-attendance), Section 84 (proclamation for person absconding), Section 209 (punishment for non-appearance), and Section 351 (recording of statement of the accused).
Source reference: para 7Reasoning
The Court balanced the gravity of the allegations and the applicant's three criminal antecedents against the procedural status of the case.
Source reference: para 4-6It noted that the charge-sheet has already been filed, meaning the custodial interrogation or investigation requirement is satisfied.
Source reference: para 3, 6The Court took into account that the applicant had been incarcerated since January 12, 2026, and acknowledged that the trial was unlikely to conclude in the near future.
Source reference: para 6Despite the State's opposition regarding the seized quantity of liquor and the applicant's history, the Court found that continued detention was not necessary, provided that the liberty of bail was balanced with stringent conditions to ensure the applicant’s cooperation with the trial process.
Source reference: para 6-7Holding
The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties.
The holding is contingent upon several conditions: the applicant must not seek adjournments during evidence, must appear personally on all fixed dates (unless exempted), and must specifically appear for the framing of charges and the recording of his statement under Section 351 of the BNSS.
Source reference: para 7Any violation of these conditions or misuse of liberty allows the trial court to proceed against him under Sections 209 or 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
Source reference: para 7Original Court PDF
KISHAN LAL BANJAREvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in