Chhattisgarh High Court

Filing of charge-sheet and duration of custody warrant regular bail under Excise Act despite existing criminal antecedents.

KISHAN LAL BANJARE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 23, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Kishan Lal Banjare, was arrested on January 12, 2026, following a police raid in Lailunga, District Raigarh, where he was allegedly found in possession of 35 liters of illicit country-made mahua liquor stored in two jerricans.

Source reference: para 1-2

He was charged under Sections 34(2) and 59(a) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act.

Source reference: para 1

The applicant has three prior criminal antecedents.

Source reference: para 3

The investigation is complete, the charge-sheet has been filed, and the applicant moved this First Bail Application under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

Source reference: para 1, 3
02

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, given the nature of the offense and his criminal history.

Source reference: para 1, 6
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the grant of regular bail.

Source reference: para 1

Sections 34(2) and 59(a) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, where the prescribed punishment ranges from one to three years of imprisonment.

Source reference: para 1, 3

The Court also referenced procedural safeguards under the BNSS, including Section 269 (punishment for non-attendance), Section 84 (proclamation for person absconding), Section 209 (punishment for non-appearance), and Section 351 (recording of statement of the accused).

Source reference: para 7
04

Reasoning

The Court balanced the gravity of the allegations and the applicant's three criminal antecedents against the procedural status of the case.

Source reference: para 4-6

It noted that the charge-sheet has already been filed, meaning the custodial interrogation or investigation requirement is satisfied.

Source reference: para 3, 6

The Court took into account that the applicant had been incarcerated since January 12, 2026, and acknowledged that the trial was unlikely to conclude in the near future.

Source reference: para 6

Despite the State's opposition regarding the seized quantity of liquor and the applicant's history, the Court found that continued detention was not necessary, provided that the liberty of bail was balanced with stringent conditions to ensure the applicant’s cooperation with the trial process.

Source reference: para 6-7
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties.

The holding is contingent upon several conditions: the applicant must not seek adjournments during evidence, must appear personally on all fixed dates (unless exempted), and must specifically appear for the framing of charges and the recording of his statement under Section 351 of the BNSS.

Source reference: para 7

Any violation of these conditions or misuse of liberty allows the trial court to proceed against him under Sections 209 or 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Source reference: para 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

KISHAN LAL BANJAREvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment