FIR based on medical reports predating the alleged time of occurrence is an abuse of process.

The Petitioner sought quashing of Danapur P.S. Case No. 415 of 2024, registered under Sections 341, 323, and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant (Opposite Party No. 2) alleged that on 04.05.2024 at 7:30 P.M., the Petitioner (his brother-in-law) assaulted him with an iron rod over a dispute regarding performing Puja at a temple.

The Petitioner contended that the FIR was a vexatious countersuit following a family dispute where the informant had actually assaulted the Petitioner's family.

Critically, the Petitioner produced a medical report (Annexure-P2) from PMCH dated 04.05.2024 with a timestamp of 7:05 P.M., which preceded the alleged time of occurrence.

1. Whether the continuation of the criminal proceeding constitutes an abuse of the process of law due to inherent improbabilities and evidence of concoction.

2. Whether the FIR and subsequent proceedings should be quashed under the inherent powers of the High Court.

The Court primarily applied the principles governing the quashing of FIRs as established by the Supreme Court of India in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335, which permits quashing where allegations are so absurd or inherently improbable that no prudent person could reach a just conclusion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding.

It further emphasized the duty of a constitutional court to prevent the abuse of legal processes for settling personal scores.

The Court observed a "glaring anomaly" in the prosecution's evidence: the FIR stated the assault occurred at 7:30 P.M. on 04.05.2024, yet the medical examination report bore a computer entry timestamp of 7:05 P.M. on the same day.

This discrepancy indicated that the medical report was prepared in collusion and prior to the alleged incident, rendering the prosecution's version "absurd and inherently improbable".

The Court reasoned that the case arose from a personal family feud between brothers-in-law and that the informant had used the judicial machinery as a platform to settle personal scores.

Allowing such a trial to proceed would result in a "travesty of justice".

The Patna High Court allowed the application and quashed Danapur P.S. Case No. 415 of 2024 along with the entire criminal proceeding arising therefrom.