Facts
The applicant, Satyam Keshari, was arrested on January 21, 2026, in connection with Crime No. 05/2026 registered at P.S. Gandhinagar
Source reference: para. 1, 3According to the prosecution, an FIR was filed following a complaint by Inspector Pradeep Jaiswal alleging that the applicant and co-accused Ujjwal Upadhyay operated illegal cricket betting activities
Source reference: para. 2They were accused of procuring "mule" bank accounts from others to circulate proceeds derived from these illegal transactions
Source reference: para. 2The applicant filed this First Bail Application after the charge-sheet was filed, seeking release on the ground of parity with co-accused Amit Mishra @Pahlu, who was granted bail on May 5, 2026
Source reference: para. 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, based on the principle of parity and the completion of the investigation
Source reference: para. 1, 6Law Applied
The court applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the High Court's power to grant regular bail
Source reference: para. 1Sections 318(4), 317(4), 111, and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
Source reference: para. 1the court relied on the principle of parity in bail jurisprudence, which suggests that similarly situated accused persons should be treated equally regarding their liberty
Source reference: para. 3, 6procedural requirements for bail conditions were informed by Sections 269 and 209 of the BNS and Sections 84, 351 of the BNSS
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The court evaluated the application by weighing the nature of the allegations against the current status of the legal proceedings. It noted that the investigation was effectively complete as the charge-sheet had already been filed
Source reference: para. 6High weight was given to the fact that a co-accused, Amit Mishra @Pahlu, involved in the same transaction, had already been granted bail by the same court just one day prior in MCRC No. 4138/2026
Source reference: para. 3, 6Although the applicant had one previous criminal antecedent and had been in custody since January 21, 2026, the court determined that these factors, combined with the filing of the charge-sheet, justified the extension of parity to the applicant
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of Satyam Keshari on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties
The grant of bail was made subject to strict conditions, including: (i) an undertaking not to seek unnecessary adjournments; (ii) mandatory presence on all trial dates; (iii) personal appearance during framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 BNSS; and (iv) a warning that violation of these terms would lead to proceedings under Sections 209 and 269 of the BNS
Source reference: para. 7Original Court PDF
SATYAM KESHARIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in