Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

For a 2017 fatal accident, notional income of ₹11,000 monthly and 40% future prospects were appropriate for a 27-year-old.

ALOKA vs D SURESH BABU

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 22, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
For a 2017 fatal accident, notional income of ₹11,000 monthly and 40% future prospects were appropriate for a 27-year-old.. ALOKA vs D SURESH BABU. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

On 11 December 2017, the deceased, aged 27, died when the motorcycle on which he was travelling was hit by a lorry.

Source reference: p.3–4

His dependants filed a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mysuru.

Source reference: p.3–4

The Tribunal awarded ₹17,39,500 with interest at 6% per annum.

Source reference: p.3–4

The claimants appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

Source reference: p.3–4

They contended that the deceased’s notional monthly income should have been assessed at ₹11,000 and that the Tribunal had not properly assessed compensation under conventional heads.

Source reference: p.4
02

Issues

1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the deceased’s notional income and resulting loss of dependency required enhancement.

Source reference: p.4–6

2. Whether the claimants were entitled to enhanced compensation under the conventional head of loss of consortium.

Source reference: p.6
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against an award of a Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: p.2

In assessing loss of dependency, the Court applied the relevant notional-income chart for the accident year, added 40% for future prospects for a deceased aged 27, deducted one-fourth of income for personal expenses where there were five dependants, and applied a multiplier of 17.

Source reference: p.6

For loss of consortium, the Court assessed ₹48,400 for each of the five claimants.

Source reference: p.6

No judicial precedents were cited.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the Tribunal’s notional monthly income assessment of ₹9,800 was low for a 2017 accident and substituted ₹11,000.

Source reference: p.6

Applying 40% for future prospects, deducting one-fourth for personal expenses, and using a multiplier of 17, the Court recalculated loss of dependency as ₹23,56,200.

Source reference: p.6

It also increased loss of consortium from ₹2,00,000 to ₹2,42,000, allowing ₹48,400 for each of the five dependants; the awards for loss of estate and transportation and funeral expenses remained unchanged.

Source reference: p.6–7
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The total compensation was enhanced from ₹17,39,500 to ₹26,38,200, making the enhancement ₹8,98,700.

Source reference: p.7–8

The enhanced amount is payable with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the appeal until realization, and the second respondent insurer was directed to deposit it within eight weeks of receiving the certified judgment.

Source reference: p.8

The Tribunal was directed to release the entire amount to the claimants upon proper identification.

Source reference: p.8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

ALOKAvsD SURESH BABU

Karnataka High Court · September 22, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment