Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

For minors with permanent disabilities, future income loss must be calculated using minimum wages, multiplier, and disability.

DEEPAK V S vs SOMSHEKHARA

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 15, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
For minors with permanent disabilities, future income loss must be calculated using minimum wages, multiplier, and disability.. DEEPAK V S vs SOMSHEKHARA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant, a minor aged 13 at the time, sustained injuries in a road traffic accident on 4 February 2023, allegedly caused by the negligent riding of a motorcycle.

Source reference: p.4

The Tribunal awarded him ₹2,14,400, including ₹27,300 for loss of future income due to permanent disability, and directed the insurer to pay the award with 6% annual interest.

Source reference: pp.3–5

The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

Source reference: p.2
02

Issues

Whether the compensation for loss of future income due to the minor claimant’s permanent disability was correctly assessed.

Source reference: pp.4–5

Whether the compensation awarded under pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and other heads required enhancement.

Source reference: pp.5–7
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Source reference: p.2

Relying on Hitesh Nagjibhai Patel v. Bababhai Nagjibhai Rabari & Anr., (2025) INSC 1070, the Court applied the principle that, for a minor injured in an accident, loss of future income due to disability is assessed by taking minimum wages, applying the appropriate multiplier, and accounting for the disability.

Source reference: p.4

The Court used the 2023 minimum wage for skilled labour, ₹13,650 per month, a multiplier of 15, and 7% whole-body disability.

Source reference: pp.4–5
04

Reasoning

The Court accepted the Tribunal’s assessment of whole-body disability at 7%, based on the doctor’s evidence of 23% disability to the left lower limb, but replaced the multiplier of 13 with 15 and applied the 2023 skilled-worker minimum wage; this produced future loss of income of ₹1,71,990.

Source reference: pp.4–5

In view of the claimant’s injuries, including a severely comminuted supracondylar fracture of the left femur, the Court enhanced pain and suffering from ₹25,000 to ₹60,000 and loss of amenities from ₹10,000 to ₹50,000.

Source reference: pp.5–6

It upheld the medical expenses of ₹1,37,100 and incidental expenses of ₹15,000, and allowed ₹27,300 for the parent’s loss of income during the claimant’s two-month recovery period.

Source reference: pp.6–7
05

Holding

The Court allowed the appeal in part and increased the total compensation from ₹2,14,400 to ₹4,61,390, resulting in enhanced compensation of ₹2,46,990, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realisation.

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest before the Tribunal within six weeks; the entire enhanced amount was to be kept in a fixed deposit in the minor claimant’s name until he attained majority.

Source reference: p.8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

DEEPAK V SvsSOMSHEKHARA

Karnataka High Court · October 15, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment