Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Functional disability may be assessed from medical records despite non-examination of the treating doctor.

SRI M K MANOJ vs SRI MAYANA SYED SAB

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 21, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Functional disability may be assessed from medical records despite non-examination of the treating doctor.. SRI M K MANOJ vs SRI MAYANA SYED SAB. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant sustained serious head and ankle injuries in a motorcycle accident on 22 March 2014. He underwent three surgeries and was hospitalized for 45 days; his medical expenses were Rs.13,68,073.

Source reference: p.2–6

The Tribunal awarded Rs.15,18,368, including medical expenses, but declined compensation for future loss of earning capacity because the treating doctor had not testified. The claimant appealed seeking reassessment and enhancement. A Neuro Psychological Assessment Report (Ex.P18) assessed cognitive disability at 77%; the doctor who testified was not the treating doctor.

Source reference: p.2–6

The insurer’s liability was undisputed.

Source reference: p.3
02

Issues

Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of compensation for the claimant’s injuries and their consequences was adequate, including whether compensation for future loss of earning capacity should be awarded.

Source reference: p.3, 5–7

Whether the compensation under pain and suffering, incidental expenses, laid-up-period income, and loss of amenities required enhancement.

Source reference: p.5–6
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act.

Source reference: p.2

The claimant relied on Rajkumar v. Ajay Kumar, (2011) 1 SCC 343, in support of his submission that disability evidence need not invariably come from the treating doctor; the judgment does not set out or expressly adopt a distinct rule from that decision.

Source reference: p.4

The Court treated the 77% cognitive-disability assessment as non-conclusive, but held that the evidence nevertheless established disability warranting compensation.

Source reference: p.7–8
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the serious injuries, three surgeries, 45-day hospitalization, medical records, photographs, and Neuro Psychological Assessment Report.

Source reference: p.6–8

Although the 77% assessment was not conclusive and the treating doctor had not testified, the Court found that the claimant had suffered disability affecting his future life and assessed functional disability at 50%.

Source reference: p.6–8

As occupation and income were unproved, it used notional monthly income of Rs.8,500, added 40% for future prospects, and applied multiplier 17, arriving at Rs.12,13,800 for future loss of earning capacity.

Source reference: p.8

It also increased compensation under other heads in light of the injuries and treatment, while leaving the medical-expense award unchanged.

Source reference: p.8–10
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part, and the award was modified. The Court reassessed total compensation at Rs.29,32,873, as against the Tribunal’s Rs.15,18,368, including Rs.12,13,800 for future loss of earning capacity.

The enhanced compensation carries interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization, and the entire compensation was directed to be released to the claimant.

Source reference: p.10–11
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI M K MANOJvsSRI MAYANA SYED SAB

Karnataka High Court · September 21, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment