Chhattisgarh High Court
Civil LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Future income loss requires proof of permanent functional disability affecting earning capacity.

KUNWAR SINGH SAHU vs KIRTAN SAHU

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: September 28, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Future income loss requires proof of permanent functional disability affecting earning capacity.. KUNWAR SINGH SAHU vs KIRTAN SAHU. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

On 15 January 2020, the appellant was injured when a Bolero driven by respondent No. 1 allegedly hit his motorcycle.

Source reference: para. 1

He sought compensation, alleging fractures to his right hand and leg.

Source reference: paras. 1–3

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded ₹75,157, including treatment expenses and amounts under other heads.

Source reference: paras. 1–3

The appellant appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

Source reference: paras. 1–3
02

Issues

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal required enhancement

Source reference: paras. 4–6

Whether the evidence supported compensation for permanent disability or loss of future income

Source reference: paras. 7–8

Whether the amount awarded for attendant charges was adequate

Source reference: para. 10
03

Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, provides for an appeal from an award of a Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: para. 1

The Court applied the principle that loss of future income requires evidence of permanent functional disability affecting earning capacity; absent such evidence, that head of compensation cannot be awarded.

Source reference: para. 8

Compensation under individual heads must be assessed against the evidence on record, including the claimant’s treatment and period of hospitalisation.

Source reference: paras. 9–10

No precedent was cited.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The claimant had not produced a disability certificate from an authorised Medical Board or other evidence establishing permanent functional disability or its effect on his earning capacity; the Tribunal therefore did not err in declining to award loss of future income.

Source reference: paras. 7–8

The discharge ticket established five days of hospitalisation, and the documentary evidence supported the treatment expenses awarded; the Court also found the amount for physical and mental agony adequate.

Source reference: para. 9

However, given the five-day hospital stay, the ₹1,000 awarded for attendant charges was inadequate and warranted enhancement to ₹3,000.

Source reference: para. 10
05

Holding

The Court partly enhanced the award from ₹75,157 to ₹77,157 by increasing attendant charges to ₹3,000.

The appellant was granted an additional ₹2,000, with interest at 6% per annum from the date the claim application was filed until realization.

Source reference: paras. 11–12

The appeal was disposed of, and the remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left unchanged.

Source reference: paras. 11–12
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

KUNWAR SINGH SAHUvsKIRTAN SAHU

Chhattisgarh High Court · September 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment