Facts
The petitioner, a resident of Gram Parsahi, filed a writ petition against the unauthorized operation of a dairy by Respondent No. 5 adjacent to his residence
Source reference: para. 2The petitioner alleged that the respondent was dumping animal waste against his boundary wall, causing foul odors, environmental pollution, health hazards, and structural damage to his property
Source reference: para. 2Despite submitting complaints to the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Parsahi on 09.11.2023 and 04.03.2025, as well as a representation to the Collector, no action was taken by the authorities
Source reference: para. 2The petitioner sought a direction for the Gram Panchayat to take legal action against the unauthorized dairy and ensure proper sanitation
Source reference: para. 1Issues
1. Whether the Gram Panchayat and local authorities are obligated to resolve grievances regarding public nuisance and health hazards caused by unauthorized dairy operations
Source reference: para. 2/42. Whether the court should direct a time-bound administrative inquiry and disposal of the petitioner's complaints
Source reference: para. 5Law Applied
The court's decision is anchored in the administrative and regulatory powers vested in the Gram Panchayat under the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993, and related sanitation bylaws
Source reference: no citationThe principle applied is that administrative authorities are duty-bound to consider and decide upon representations regarding statutory violations and public grievances within their jurisdiction
Source reference: para. 4Reasoning
The Court did not adjudicate on the merits of the allegations but focused on the failure of the administrative machinery to respond to the petitioner’s grievances. Noting that the petitioner had already approached the Sarpanch and the Collector without receiving a resolution, the Court determined that the appropriate remedy was to compel the Gram Panchayat to exercise its statutory functions
Source reference: para. 2, para. 4The Court emphasized the necessity of a fair procedure, directing that the Gram Panchayat must afford a hearing to all stakeholders—the petitioner, other affected villagers, and the private respondent (dairy owner)—before passing a reasoned order
Source reference: para. 4Holding
The High Court disposed of the petition by directing the concerned Gram Panchayat to consider the petitioner's case and pass appropriate orders, specifically that a proper opportunity of hearing be provided to the petitioner, the villagers, and Respondent No. 5
The entire exercise is mandated to be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the court's order
Source reference: para. 5Original Court PDF
HEMANT KUMAR PATELvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in