Chhattisgarh High Court

Grant of bail despite criminal antecedents where accused remained in custody and trial was delayed.

RAIFAZ vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 22, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Five applicants (Shoyeb, Takir Khan, Raifaz, Adam Shah, and Ajhar Khan) were arrested on January 6, 2026, in connection with Crime No. 14/2026.

Source reference: para 2, 7

It was alleged that on the night of January 4, 2026, the applicants, acting as an organized gang, forcibly tied and loaded cattle into pickup vehicles for illegal transportation/smuggling into Jharkhand.

Source reference: para 3

Stolen cattle, vehicles, and cash were recovered based on their memorandum statements.

Source reference: para 3

The applicants sought regular bail on the grounds of false implication and the fact that a charge-sheet had already been filed.

Source reference: para 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicants are entitled to grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) considering their period of detention and the nature of the allegations.

Source reference: para 2, 7
03

Law Applied

The Court applied the provisions for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS).

Source reference: para 2

The court also applied the principle that while criminal antecedents are relevant, old/stale cases or the grant of bail in connected matters can influence the court’s discretion in favor of the accused.

Source reference: para 7
04

Reasoning

The Court examined the gravity of the offense, noting the applicants were part of an organized gang involved in cattle theft and illegal transportation.

Source reference: para 7

The Court weighed this against the period of detention (since January 6, 2025/2026) and the procedural status where the charge-sheet had already been filed.

Source reference: para 4, 7

The Court noted that although the applicants had several criminal antecedents from 2025, 2021, and 2019, one particular case (2019) was "old and stale".

Source reference: para 7

Crucially, the Court observed that in the applicants' primary previous crime (Crime No. 901/2025), the High Court had granted them bail in separate applications decided on the same day; consequently, finding parity and considering the completion of the investigation, the Court determined that continued incarceration was unnecessary.

Source reference: para 7
05

Holding

The Court allowed the bail applications.

The applicants were ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing personal bonds and sureties (two local sureties for Takir Khan; two general sureties for others) to the satisfaction of the trial court subject to strict conditions including a prohibition on seeking unnecessary adjournments and compulsory presence during key trial stages.

Source reference: para 8
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

RAIFAZvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 22, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment