Chhattisgarh High Court

Grant of bail for cheating and conspiracy under BNS where charge-sheet is filed and accused is elderly.

NANASINGH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 25, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, a 50-year-old resident of Maharashtra, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 51/2026 at Police Station City Kotwali, Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara

Source reference: para. 1, 2

The complainant, Kamal Sahu, alleged that while seeking medical treatment, he was deceived by the accused who claimed ritualistic rites were required to extract "eight pots of gold and silver" from the complainant's field

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant has been in custody since November 23, 2025

Source reference: para. 3

While he has no criminal record in Maharashtra, the State noted one antecedent in Madhya Pradesh

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, considering his age, health, and the stage of the trial

Source reference: para. 1, 6
03

Law Applied

The Court considered the provisions of Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the High Court's power to grant bail

Source reference: para. 1

The offences were registered under Sections 318(4) (cheating) and 61(2) (criminal conspiracy) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

Source reference: para. 1, 7

The Court weighed the liberty of the individual against the necessity of ensuring presence during trial, particularly for an out-of-state resident with a minor criminal antecedent

Source reference: para. 4, 7
04

Reasoning

The Court balanced the gravity of the allegations of deception with the personal circumstances of the applicant. It noted that the applicant is 50 years old, allegedly suffering from a brain hemorrhage, and had already been incarcerated for approximately five months

Source reference: para. 3, 6

Although the State opposed bail citing a criminal antecedent in Madhya Pradesh, the Court observed that the charge-sheet had already been filed, meaning the investigation was complete

Source reference: para. 4, 6

Given that the trial was expected to take considerable time, the Court reasoned that further detention was unnecessary, provided stringent conditions were imposed to ensure the applicant’s cooperation with the judicial process despite him being a resident of another state

Source reference: para. 6, 7
05

Holding

The Court allowed the application and granted regular bail to the applicant

The holding directed his release upon furnishing a personal bond with two local sureties, subject to specific conditions: the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments, must appear at every hearing (specifically for framing of charges and recording statements under Section 351 BNSS), and must comply with procedural requirements under Section 269 BNS and Section 84 BNSS in case of default

Source reference: para. 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

NANASINGHvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 25, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment