Facts
The applicant was arrested on 29.01.2026 after police intercepted a motorcycle following a secret tip regarding the transport of contraband from Odisha.
Source reference: para 2A bag situated between two riders was found to contain 10 kilograms of Ganja.
Source reference: para 2The applicant was charged under Section 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985.
Source reference: para 1The applicant moved the High Court for regular bail, arguing that the recovery was of an "intermediate quantity," he had no criminal antecedents, and he had been in custody since the date of the incident.
Source reference: para 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, considering the quantity of contraband seized and the lack of criminal history.
Source reference: para 1, 6Law Applied
Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985, which penalizes the possession and transport of cannabis.
Source reference: para 1Section 37 of the NDPS Act, noting that its stringent rigours for denying bail do not strictly apply to "intermediate quantities" (quantities falling between 'small' and 'commercial').
Source reference: para 3Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the High Court's power to grant bail.
Source reference: para 1Reasoning
The Court observed that the 10 kilograms of Ganja seized constitutes an "intermediate quantity," meaning the statutory bars to bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act are not attracted.
Source reference: para 3, 6The Court evaluated the applicant's profile, noting a lack of prior criminal records and the fact that he had already been in judicial custody for nearly three months (since 29.01.2026).
Source reference: para 6Since the investigation was complete and the trial was expected to take a considerable amount of time, the Court reasoned that continued custodial detention was unnecessary to serve the ends of justice.
Source reference: para 6Holding
The Court answered the issue in the affirmative and granted regular bail to the applicant.
The applicant was ordered to be released upon furnishing a personal bond with two local sureties, subject to several conditions: he must not seek unnecessary adjournments, must appear at all trial stages (charges, evidence, and Section 351 BNSS statements), and must comply with procedures under Section 269 and 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) in case of default or non-appearance.
Source reference: para 7Original Court PDF
KRIPAL SINGHvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in