Facts
The applicant, a professional driver, was arrested on 28.02.2026 in connection with Crime No. 208/2026.
Source reference: para 1According to the prosecution, on 27.02.2026, the applicant was driving a trailer (CG-11-BD-9044) which collided with a Mahindra Scorpio, resulting in the immediate death of four individuals.
Source reference: para 2The applicant sought regular bail, contending that the accident was caused by a technical fault in the vehicle rather than rash or negligent driving.
Source reference: para 3The State opposed the bail, citing the gravity of the offense and the loss of multiple lives.
Source reference: para 4Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering the nature of the accident and his period of incarceration.
Source reference: para 1, 6Law Applied
Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the High Court's power to grant bail.
Source reference: para 1Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS), 2023, specifically Section 281 (Rash driving), Section 125(a) (Causing hurt by act endangering life), and Section 105 (Culpable homicide not amounting to murder).
Source reference: para 1Procedural compliance under Sections 269, 84, 209, and 351 of the BNSS to ensure the applicant’s participation in the trial.
Source reference: para 7Reasoning
The Court balanced the severity of the incident (four fatalities) against the mitigating factors presented by the applicant, noting the applicant's defense that the collision stemmed from a "technical fault" rather than criminal negligence.
Source reference: para 3, 6Heavily influencing the decision was the fact that the applicant had no prior criminal antecedents.
Source reference: para 4, 6Procedurally, the Court observed that the charge-sheet had already been filed and the applicant had been in custody since February 2026; given that a trial conclusion would take considerable time, the Court determined that continued pre-trial detention was not warranted, provided strict conditions were imposed.
Source reference: para 6-7Holding
The Court answered the issue in the affirmative and allowed the bail application.
The applicant was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, subject to specific conditions: no unnecessary adjournments, appearance on all trial dates, no absconding or facing proclamation proceedings under Section 84 BNSS, and presence for framing of charges and recording of statements.
Source reference: para 7Original Court PDF
NAVRATAN SINGH UIKEvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in