Chhattisgarh High Court

Grant of Bail for Possession of Commercial Quantity of Liquor Where Accused Lacks Criminal Antecedents and Investigation is Complete

SAROJ KUMAR BANOTHE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 27, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant was arrested on 17.12.2025 during routine patrolling by the Excise Police.

Source reference: para. 2

Acting on credible information, the police intercepted a Mahindra Scorpio car (MP-09-BC-3962) and recovered 180 bulk liters (20 cartons) of Goa Whisky manufactured in Madhya Pradesh, being transported illegally.

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant was charged under Sections 34(2), 36, and 59(A) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915.

Source reference: para. 1

Following the completion of the investigation, a final report was filed before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dongargarh.

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant approached the High Court seeking regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

Source reference: para. 1
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail considering the nature of the offense and the duration of his pretrial detention.

Source reference: para. 3-6
03

Law Applied

The court applied the provisions of Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the grant of regular bail.

Source reference: para. 1

Section 34(2) prescribes a minimum punishment of one year and a maximum of three years.

Source reference: para. 3

The court also adhered to the procedural mandates of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), specifically Sections 209 and 269, and Section 351 of the BNSS, concerning the conduct of the accused during trial and consequences of non-appearance.

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The court evaluated the gravity of the allegations involving the illegal transportation of 180 bulk liters of foreign liquor against the mitigating factors presented by the applicant.

Source reference: para. 6

It noted that the applicant had no prior criminal antecedents.

Source reference: para. 4

The court observed that the applicant had been in custody since 17.12.2025 and that the charge-sheet had already been filed, signifying the completion of the custodial investigation.

Source reference: para. 4, 6

Reasoning that the trial's conclusion would likely take significant time, the court determined that further detention was not warranted, provided strict conditions were imposed to ensure the applicant’s presence during trial proceedings.

Source reference: para. 6, 7
05

Holding

The court answered the issue in the affirmative and granted regular bail to the applicant.

The applicant was ordered to be released on a personal bond with two local sureties, subject to specific conditions: (i) no seeking of adjournments during witness testimony; (ii) mandatory appearance on all trial dates under penalty of Section 269 BNS; (iii) proceedings under Section 209 BNS for misuse of liberty; and (iv) personal presence during case opening, framing of charges, and recording of statements under Section 351 BNSS.

Source reference: para. 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SAROJ KUMAR BANOTHEvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 27, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment