Facts
The applicant, Harish Sahu, was arrested on 27.01.2026 in connection with Crime No. 20/2026 at Police Station Banki Mongra.
Source reference: para 2The prosecution alleges that on 26.01.2026, the applicant and three co-accused trespassed into a victim’s trailer, demanded money, and threatened assault.
Source reference: para 2While the victim resisted, the applicant was apprehended by local residents and handed over to the police.
Source reference: para 2The applicant filed this first bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS, contending false implication, lack of criminal antecedents, and the completion of the charge-sheet.
Source reference: para 3The State opposed the bail citing the gravity of the midnight trespass and threats.
Source reference: para 4Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS considering his period of detention and the nature of the allegations.
Source reference: para 1 & 6Law Applied
The court applied the provisions of Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the grant of regular bail.
Source reference: para 1It also considered the substantive offences defined under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), specifically Sections 308(2) (extortion/robbery related), 324(2) (mischief/trespass), 115(2) (voluntary hurt), and 3(5) (common intention).
Source reference: para 2Reasoning
The Court examined the nature and gravity of the incident, specifically the unlawful trespass into the victim’s vehicle during night hours and the subsequent threats.
Source reference: para 6The Court shifted its focus to the procedural status and the applicant's personal history, noting that the applicant had been in detention since 27.01.2026 and, crucially, had no prior criminal record.
Source reference: para 6Since the charge-sheet has already been filed, the investigation is complete, and the trial is expected to take significant time to conclude, the Court determined that continued incarceration was unnecessary for the purpose of the trial.
Source reference: para 3 & 6Holding
The Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of Harish Sahu upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.
The holding is contingent upon several conditions: the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments, must appear personally on certain trial milestones like framing of charges, and must comply with Section 269 of the BNS and Section 84 of the BNSS regarding presence and appearances; any default in these conditions shall be treated as an abuse of liberty.
Source reference: para 8Original Court PDF
HARISH SAHU @ HARIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in