Gujarat High CourtProperty and Real Estate LawAdministrative and Public Law

Gujarat HC Quashes Fragmentation Act Orders Against Buyers After Amendment Regularises Their 2023 Land Purchase

SANDIP GANPATBHAI PATELv.STATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat HC Quashes Fragmentation Act Orders Against Buyers After Amendment Regularises Their 2023 Land Purchase. SANDIP GANPATBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT. Gujarat High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the sale deed dated 31 March 2023 fell within the period covered by Section 9(4) of the Fragmentation Act, as inserted by the 14 July 2026 amendment

The court held

The Court allowed the petition, held that the proceedings stood abated under Section 9(4) of the Fragmentation Act

It also directed

and quashed and set aside the SSRD’s order dated 20 February 2026 and the Collector’s order dated 24 September 2024

01Facts

The petitioners challenged the SSRD’s order dated 20 February 2026 and the Collector’s order dated 24 September 2024, concerning mutation entry No. 4291 based on a registered sale deed executed in their favour on 31 March 2023. The authorities had proceeded on the ground that the transaction contravened the Gujarat Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 (“Fragmentation Act”)

¶ 1, 4

During the hearing, the State relied on the 14 July 2026 notification amending the Act to provide for regularisation of specified transfers and abatement of pending proceedings

¶ 3, 6

02Issues

i.Whether the sale deed dated 31 March 2023 fell within the period covered by Section 9(4) of the Fragmentation Act, as inserted by the 14 July 2026 amendment

¶ 4, 6–7

ii.Whether the proceedings concerning the mutation entry and the impugned orders were required to abate under that provision

¶ 5, 7–8

03Law Applied

Section 9(4) of the Fragmentation Act, inserted by the 14 July 2026 amendment, provides that a transfer or partition contrary to the Act, made on or after 29 January 1948 and on or before 31 March 2026, is deemed regularised without penalty or premium, and that all pending proceedings before any officer or authority concerning that transfer or partition abate

¶ 6

The Court also referred to the amendment to Section 5, but its decision turned on Section 9(4)

¶ 6–7

Provisions in the judgment · 3 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Gujarat Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 Section 4Section 5Section 9

04Reasoning

The sale deed was executed on 31 March 2023, within the period specified in Section 9(4).

¶ 4, 7–8

The proceedings had been initiated on the basis of an alleged breach of the Fragmentation Act and remained pending in the form of the challenged orders. The Court therefore held that the transaction was covered by the statutory regularisation and that the related proceedings stood abated

¶ 7–8

05Holding

The Court allowed the petition, held that the proceedings stood abated under Section 9(4) of the Fragmentation Act

¶ 8

and quashed and set aside the SSRD’s order dated 20 February 2026 and the Collector’s order dated 24 September 2024

¶ 8
Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

SANDIP GANPATBHAI PATELvsSTATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat High Court · October 26, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment