Facts
This Miscellaneous Civil Case (MCC) originated from an office reference based on a request letter (PUD) dated 16.01.2026 submitted by the Second Additional District Judge, Dhamtari.
Source reference: para 1The lower court sought an extension of time to dispose of Civil Appeal Nos. 36-A/2018 and 05-A/2018.
Source reference: para 1Previously, while deciding Second Appeal Nos. 81/2024 and 46/2024 on 15.09.2025, the High Court had expressed an "expectation" that the first appellate court would decide the aforementioned appeals expeditiously, preferably within three months.
Source reference: para 1, 2Although the previous order was not a mandatory direction, the Presiding Officer of the concerned court proactively sought a formal extension of time.
Source reference: para 2Issues
Whether a formal extension of time is required for the disposal of appeals when the High Court’s prior order expressed an "expectation" rather than a "mandatory direction."
Source reference: para 2Law Applied
The Court applied the principle of judicial administration concerning the expeditious disposal of cases.
Source reference: para 2It distinguished between an "expectation" (recommendatory in nature) and a "mandatory direction" (obligatory in nature) issued by a superior court to a subordinate court regarding trial timelines.
Source reference: para 2The Court maintained that while recommendatory timelines are not strictly binding, the lower court's request for an extension warrants a formal acknowledgement to ensure the timely delivery of justice.
Source reference: para 3Reasoning
The Court analyzed its previous judgment dated 15.09.2025 and clarified that it had merely expressed an expectation for disposal within three months, not a mandatory command.
Source reference: para 2However, the Court took cognizance of the Presiding Officer’s letter dated 16.01.2026 seeking more time.
Source reference: para 2Connecting the need for judicial efficiency with the current status of the appeals, the Court determined that it was appropriate to provide a clear, albeit still expectational, renewed timeframe to facilitate the lower court's efforts in concluding the long-pending appeals from 2018.
Source reference: para 3Holding
The High Court disposed of the MCC by granting the requested extension.
It held that the Second Additional District Judge, Dhamtari, shall make an endeavor to decide Civil Appeal Nos. 36-A/2018 and 05-A/2018 within a further period of three months from the date of receipt of the order.
Source reference: para 3, 4No mandatory directions were issued, but the expectation for expeditious disposal was reiterated.
Source reference: para 4Original Court PDF
PREET RAMvsSMT. RAHIMAT BAI
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in