Facts
The Appellant, a real estate firm, entered into a Development Agreement (DA) with Respondent No. 1 (a Housing Society) on 20.12.2011 for a redevelopment project
Source reference: para. 4Clause 36 of the DA contained an arbitration agreement for resolving disputes
Source reference: para. 4Subsequently, the Appellant entered into individual Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements (PAAA) with five society members (Respondents)
Source reference: para. 5Clause 14 of the PAAA stated that all terms of the DA "shall be construed to form a part of these presents" and shall be "binding on the parties hereto"
Source reference: para. 5Following consumer complaints filed by the members, the Appellant invoked arbitration under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Source reference: para. 6The High Court of Bombay dismissed the Appellant’s Section 11 applications, holding that there was no specific arbitration agreement between the Appellant and individual members, as the DA reference was merely generic
Source reference: para. 7Issues
1. Whether an arbitration clause contained in a primary Development Agreement can be incorporated by reference into subsequent individual agreements (PAAA) under Section 7(5) of the Arbitration Act
Source reference: para. 2, 8Law Applied
The Court applied Section 7(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which permits the incorporation of an arbitration clause from another document provided the reference makes that clause part of the contract
Source reference: para. 8It relied on the precedent set in M.R. Engineers and Contractors Private Limited v. Som Datt Builders Limited, which established that if a contract provides that all terms and conditions of a referred document shall be read as part of the contract, the arbitration clause in the referred document is "bodily lifted" and incorporated
Source reference: para. 9It further applied NBCC (India) Limited v. Zillion Infraprojects Private Limited, holding that incorporation requires a clear intention to assimilate the arbitration clause into the new contract and that the clause must be applicable to the current dispute
Source reference: para. 10Reasoning
The Supreme Court disagreed with the High Court’s finding that the reference was "generic." The Court observed that Clause 14 of the PAAA did not merely refer to the DA but unequivocally recorded that all terms and conditions of the DA "shall be construed to form part" of the PAAA
Source reference: para. 11Under the illustration provided in paragraph 17 of M.R. Engineers, such wording indicates a conscious acceptance of the entire document, not just specific portions
Source reference: para. 11The Court reasoned that by affirming all clauses of the DA were "binding on the parties" to the PAAA, the parties intended to import the DA "body and soul" into the individual agreements
Source reference: para. 12Consequently, Clause 36 (the arbitration clause) was successfully incorporated by reference into the PAAA in compliance with Section 7(5)
Source reference: para. 12-13Holding
The Court answered the issue in the affirmative, holding that an arbitration agreement existed between the Appellant and the individual members by way of incorporation
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s common order dated 26.06.2025 and allowed the appeals. The Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator to resolve the disputes and directed the arbitrator to make a declaration under Section 12 of the Act within fifteen days
Source reference: para. 13Original Court PDF
Hirani DevelopervsNehru Nagar Samruddhi Chs Ltd.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in