Facts
The petitioner declared income under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, and was required to pay tax in three instalments. He claimed to have tendered the final instalment by cheque on 28 September 2017, but the cheque was encashed on 5 October 2017.
Source reference: para. 1–7The Principal Commissioner treated the declaration as void because the payment was credited after the 30 September 2017 deadline. The petitioner challenged that order, relying on CBDT Circular No. 15/2019, which addressed delayed bank credit where payment had been tendered by the extended date.
Source reference: para. 1–7Issues
1. Whether the petitioner’s declaration could be treated as void when he claimed to have tendered the final instalment by cheque on 28 September 2017, although it was credited on 5 October 2017
Source reference: para. 2–3, 92. Whether, upon verification, the petitioner’s payment fell within the benefit provided by CBDT Circular No. 15/2019
Source reference: para. 4–7, 9Law Applied
Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, was the basis for the CBDT’s direction that payments made on 3 October 2017 would be deemed paid by the 30 September 2017 due date, because the intervening days were bank holidays.
Source reference: para. 4Under paragraph 3 of CBDT Circular No. 15/2019, payments by cheque, RTGS, or electronic transfer tendered by 3 October 2017 and credited by the bank by 5 October 2017 are deemed paid by 30 September 2017.
Source reference: para. 4The impugned order had treated the declaration as void under paragraph 8 of Circular No. 16/2016; the order also referred to forwarding the declared information for action under Section 197(b) of the Finance Act, 2016.
Source reference: para. 2, 4Reasoning
The petitioner’s asserted dates—cheque tendered on 28 September 2017 and encashed on 5 October 2017—potentially brought his payment within Circular No. 15/2019. The Court noted both the bank certificate supporting the encashment date and the Department’s submission that the petitioner appeared entitled to the circular’s benefit.
Source reference: para. 7–8However, rather than conclusively determining eligibility, the Court directed the Principal Commissioner to verify the date the cheque was deposited and the date the amount was credited, and to apply the circular if the facts were confirmed.
Source reference: para. 9Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 1 to verify the relevant payment dates.
If satisfied that the petitioner’s case was covered by Circular No. 15/2019, the respondent was directed to pass the necessary order granting the benefit of the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, within six weeks after presentation of a certified copy of the judgment.
Source reference: para. 9Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
General Clauses Act, 18971
Original Court PDF
SACHIN KUMAR GUPTAvsPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PCIT
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
