Gujarat High Court
Civil LawInsurance Law

Insurer must satisfy the award first and recover from the insured when passenger status is unproved.

SAVITABEN VECHATBHAI BARIA (KOLI) vs GANPATBHAI JHENABHAI CHAUHAN

Gujarat High CourtJUDGMENT: October 08, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Insurer must satisfy the award first and recover from the insured when passenger status is unproved.. SAVITABEN VECHATBHAI BARIA (KOLI) vs GANPATBHAI JHENABHAI CHAUHAN. Gujarat High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

On 6 May 1999, a truck allegedly driven rashly and negligently left the road and struck Pravinbhai and others standing on the roadside; Pravinbhai was crushed under the truck and died.

Source reference: p. 1

The claimants sought compensation of ₹9,40,000. The Tribunal awarded ₹2,65,000 with 7.5% annual interest, holding the driver and owner jointly and severally liable while exonerating the insurer.

Source reference: pp. 1–2

The claimants appealed, seeking compensation of ₹5,00,000 and asking that the insurer be directed to pay first and recover from the driver and owner.

Source reference: p. 2
02

Issues

1. Whether the compensation should be enhanced to ₹5,00,000 by applying the principles in Kishan Gopal v. Lala.

Source reference: pp. 2, 6

2. Whether the insurer should satisfy the award in the first instance and recover the amount from the driver and owner.

Source reference: pp. 2–3, 7–10
03

Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: p. 1

Relying on Kishan Gopal v. Lala, 2014 (1) SCC 244, the Court treated ₹5,00,000 as just compensation in the circumstances of this case.

Source reference: pp. 3–6

It also relied on Kaminiben v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited, 2026 LiveLaw (SC) 174, and the authorities discussed there, including Manuara Khatun and Saju P. Paul, for the “pay and recover” principle: in appropriate cases involving an uninsured risk such as a gratuitous passenger, the insurer may be directed to satisfy the award first and recover the amount from the insured in the same proceedings.

Source reference: pp. 7–10
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the claimants’ reliance on Kishan Gopal and concluded that ₹5,00,000 was appropriate compensation for the loss of their son, modifying the Tribunal’s award accordingly.

Source reference: pp. 2–3, 6

On liability, the claimants argued that the deceased was a third party and there was no proof that he was travelling in the goods vehicle; the Court nevertheless applied the “pay and recover” principle drawn from Kaminiben and the cases it discussed.

Source reference: pp. 2–3, 7–10

It directed the insurer to satisfy the award first, with a right to recover from the driver and owner.

Source reference: pp. 7–10
05

Holding

The appeal was partly allowed.

The award was modified to provide fixed compensation of ₹5,00,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of the claim petition until realization.

Source reference: pp. 10–11

The opponents were held jointly and severally liable; the insurer was directed to pay first and recover from the driver and owner by executing the order.

Source reference: pp. 10–11

The Tribunal was directed to disburse the amount held by it, with accrued interest, subject to verification, procedure and deduction of any unpaid court fees.

Source reference: pp. 10–11
06

Acts & Sections Cited

4 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

SAVITABEN VECHATBHAI BARIA (KOLI)vsGANPATBHAI JHENABHAI CHAUHAN

Gujarat High Court · October 08, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment